With the Compliments of the Author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida

@article{Fish1982WithTC,
  title={With the Compliments of the Author: Reflections on Austin and Derrida},
  author={S. Fish},
  journal={Critical Inquiry},
  year={1982},
  volume={8},
  pages={693 - 721}
}
  • S. Fish
  • Published 1982
  • History
  • Critical Inquiry
What follows is a carefully circumscribed and limited attempt to explicate for an Anglo-American audience the arguments of Derrida's "Signature Event Context" (Glyph I [1977]: 172-97) as they relate to the project begun by J. L. Austin in How to Do Things with Words (Oxford, 1962); all further references to these works, abbreviated "SEC" and HT, respectively, will be included in the text. It is also an attempt, as some of my readers will recognize, to assimilate the Derrida of this and related… Expand
Dry Ink: Arguing (to) the Limits
Framed within a discussion of what constitutes the limits between an uncritical joke and a serious argument, this essay revisits the polemic between Jacques Derrida and John Searle which ensues fromExpand
History Lessons: Eagleton and the Problem of the Space of Commentary
Terry Eagleton (1982) recently announced "the end of criticism" - but characteristically the announcement was ambiguous and by the end of his paper it is obvious enough that he is actually announcingExpand
How to Do Philosophy with Words: Reflections on the Searle-Derrida debate
Nowadays philosophy is characterized by such heterogeneous intellectual practices that its very unity and coherence seem endangered. What is especially disconcerting is that most authors manage toExpand
Models of Signification and Pedagogy in J. L. Austin, John Searle, and Jacques Derrida
John Searle and Jacques Derrida's legendary dispute over J. L. Austin's speech act theory is commonly interpreted as a conflict over first assumptions and/or as an historic engagement between theExpand
Other reader-oriented theories
Introduction It is by now commonplace to point out that unlike such tightly organized schools as structuralism or Marxism, reader-oriented criticism, taking its major forms up until around 1990, isExpand
Performativity Revisited: J. L. Austin and His Legacy
The paper introduces J. L. Austin’s basic notions with a view to show how they pertain to the concept of performativity, which constitutes the point of departure for the discussion of Austin’s impactExpand
texto al contra-texto
What is a text? Can we know texts? Do texts exist? What are the limits of texts? In the last twenty-five years, French literary studies seem to be undergoing a paradigmatic transformation thatExpand
On Searle (on Austin) on language
In a very stimulating and neatly argued paper entitled `On Searle on language', published in Language & Communication, Nigel Love (1999) points out a profoundly contradictory state of a€airsExpand
The Figures Readers Make: Interpretive Plots in Reader-Oriented Criticism
The term ‘reader-oriented criticism’ has been loosely used to bracket a variety of approaches (phenomenological criticism, reception theory, reader-response, poststructuralist critiques ofExpand
Reception theory: School of Constance
Introduction Reception theory is commonly used to designate a direction in literary criticism developed by professors and students at the University of Constance in West Germany during the late 1960sExpand
...
1
2
3
4
...

References

SHOWING 1-2 OF 2 REFERENCES
Linguistic communication and speech acts
"The work of Bach and Harnish represents an able attempt by a philosopher and a linguist respectively to restore some sorely needed naturalistic assumptions to the study of linguistic communication."
Logic and conversation