Winning with the Bomb

  title={Winning with the Bomb},
  author={Kyle Beardsley and Victor Asal},
  journal={Journal of Conflict Resolution},
  pages={278 - 301}
Nuclear weapons' effects on an actor's success in coercive diplomacy are in part a function of how nuclear weapons change the perceived costs of conflict. The authors argue that states can improve their allotment of a good or convince an opponent to back down and have shorter crises if their opponents have greater expected costs of crisis. Noting that nuclear weapons increase the costs of full-escalation scenarios but decrease their probability, it is uncertain what impact nuclear weapons… 

Tables from this paper

Questioning the Effect of Nuclear Weapons on Conflict

We examine the effect of nuclear weapons on interstate conflict. Using more appropriate methodologies than have previously been used, we find that dyads in which both states possess nuclear weapons

Nuclear Weapons and Coercive Diplomacy

Are nuclear weapons useful for coercive diplomacy? Since 1945, most strategic thinking about nuclear weapons has focused on deterrence - using nuclear threats to prevent attacks against the nation's

Nuclear balance and the initiation of nuclear crises: Does superiority matter?

The nuclear competition school, an emerging theoretical perspective on the political effect of nuclear weapons, argues that a favorable nuclear balance can significantly reduce one’s expected costs

A Double-Edged Sword: Nuclear Deterrence and Nuclear Caution

Most empirical studies of the effects of nuclear weapons only consider whether a state at a given time has nuclear arms or not, but there are strong reasons to think that the effects of a state’s

The Nuclear Balance and International Conflict

There is reason to believe that the nuclear balance between states is an important determinant of international conflict, but recent international relations scholarship either ignores nuclear weapons

Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis

Do nuclear weapons reduce the probability of war? This article quantitatively evaluates the nuclear peace hypothesis. The results indicate that the impact of nuclear weapons is more complicated than

A Double Edged Sword: Nuclear Risk and Nuclear Deterrence

The majority of empirical studies of the various effects of nuclear weapons treat these weapons as a binary variable: what matter is only whether or not a particular state at any given time possesses

The Coercive Limits of Nuclear Weapons

What are the coercive effects of nuclear weapons? Sixty-five years into the nuclear age, we still lack a complete answer to this question. This article employs a new dataset of nearly 200 militarized

Nuclear Superiority and the Balance of Resolve: Explaining Nuclear Crisis Outcomes

Abstract Scholars have long debated whether nuclear superiority or the balance of resolve shapes the probability of victory in nuclear crises, but they have not clearly articulated a mechanism

Unfair fights: Power asymmetry, nascent nuclear capability, and preventive conflict

Scholars have long recognized that imminent shifts in relative power may motivate declining states to initiate conflict. But what conditions exacerbate the risk posed by these anticipated power



Proliferation and International Crisis Behavior

The literature on international conflict is divided on the impact of nuclear proliferation on state conflict. The optimists' argument contends that nuclear weapons raise the stakes so high that

Nuclear Weapons, Deterrence, and Crisis Escalation

The effect of the possession of nuclear weapons on patterns of international conflict is the subject of an extensive but generally impressionistic body of work. Assumptions in this area determine

Bargaining, Nuclear Proliferation, and Interstate Disputes

Contrasting claims about the consequences of nuclear weapons rely on different interpretations about how leaders respond to risk, uncertainty, and the balance of power. Nuclear optimists use

An Assessment of the Merits of Selective Nuclear Proliferation

We assume that in a conflict between a nation with a nuclear capability and one without, the conflict may become nuclear, while, in a conflict between two nuclear powers, the conflict is unlikely to

Evaluating the Nuclear Peace Hypothesis

Do nuclear weapons reduce the probability of war? This article quantitatively evaluates the nuclear peace hypothesis. The results indicate that the impact of nuclear weapons is more complicated than

The Extended Deterrent Value of Nuclear Weapons

Three questions are addressed in this study: (1) Does a nuclear retaliatory capability contribute to extended deterrence against a nonnuclear power? (2) If so, is the deterrent value of nuclear

The Spread of Nuclear Weapons and International Conflict

This article evaluates whether the length of time states have nuclear weapons influences their behavior and the behavior of opponents in militarized disputes. Using multiple statistical models and

Signaling Versus the Balance of Power and Interests

Conventional wisdom holds that in international disputes, a state's military threast are more likely to work the more the state is favored by the balance of power or the balance of interests.

The Effects of Different Types of Military Mobilization on the Outcome of International Crises

One dominant explanation for why crises escalate to war is based on misperception. Alternative rational explanations for why crises escalate to war are examined, including commitment problems, the

Nuclear Blackmail and Nuclear Balance

In numerous crises after World War II--Berlin, Korea, the Taiwan Straits, and the Middle East--the United States resorted to vague threats to use nuclear weapons in order to deter Soviet or Chinese