Corpus ID: 34854605

Winning By Losing: The AT&T Settlement and Its Impact on Telecommunications

  title={Winning By Losing: The AT\&T Settlement and Its Impact on Telecommunications},
  author={P. W. Macavoy and K. Robinson},
  journal={Yale Journal on Regulation},
On January 8, 1982, Assistant Attorney General William F. Baxter and Charles L. Brown, chairman of the American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT&T or Bell), jointly announced settlement of the government's 1974 antitrust suit against AT&T and its affiliates.1 The settlement, as approved by Judge Harold Greene," required AT&T to divest its local Bell operating companies and satisfied virtually all of the demands for structural relief made at trial by the Department of Justice (DOJ or… Expand
Freedom of Expression in Zimbabwe and the Telecommunications Monopoly
An overall penetration rate of 1.4 main telephone lines per 100 inhabitants, 1 a waiting period of 14 years for new connections, closure of the waiting list because the number of applicants was tooExpand
Financial Markets and the AT&T Antitrust Settlement
The 1984 Justice Department settlement with AT&T marked one of the largest antitrust action in the nation's history. At the end of the process major changes were made in the original settlementExpand
On modifying the MFJ
When the Bell operating companies (BOCs) were separated from AT&T in 1984, restrictions were imposed on the BOCs' business operations. The US Department of Justice was required to report every threeExpand
Costly Gains to Breaking Up: LECs and the Baby Bells
While the divestiture of AT&T was intended to produce benefits in the long-distance market, the evidence suggests it has created an unexpected side benefit in local telephone markets. The authors'Expand
Commiss' on Authorized in the Matter of Expanded Interconnection with Local Telephone Company Facilities Amendment of Part 36 of the ) Commission's Rules and Establishment) of a Joint Board )
  • 1993
This comment represents the views of the staff of the Bureau of Economics of the Federal Trade Commission. They are not necessarily the views of the Commission or any individual Commissioner.Expand
The economic theory of regulation and the US telecoms industry
The usual outcome of the economic theory of regulation is that regulatory processes will be dominated by the few who have much to gain, at the expense of the many who will lose. This paper arguesExpand
Technology, deregulation, and the public interest: preserving universal telephone service
  • M. Russo
  • Economics
  • IEEE Technology and Society Magazine
  • 1988
The intertwining influences on the telecommunications industry of regulatory initiatives and technological advancement are discussed. It is argued that the combined effect of this simultaneous changeExpand
Diversification and Regulated Monopoly
Although the merits of diversification by regulated utilities into competitive markets have been widely debated by economists, regulators, and public interest advocates, the efficiency consequencesExpand
The role of AT&T’s public relations campaign in press coverage of the 1982 breakup
Abstract This study examined newspaper coverage of the 1982 breakup of AT&T and the role that the company’s public relations campaign may have played in the way the story was reported. A framingExpand
The effects of economic regulation
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses alternative approaches to measure the effects of economic regulation and reviews the empirical literature employing these approaches. Economic regulationExpand


Exchange Network Facils. for Interstate Access (ENFIA), 51 RAD. REG. 2D (P & F) 677, 678 n
  • 1982
Exchange Network Facils. for Interstate Access (ENFIA), 71 F.C.C.2d
  • 1979
Second Computer Inquiry, Notice of Inquiry and Proposed Rulemaking, 61 F.C.C.2d
  • 1976
1981) (dismissing monopolistic pricing claims in equipment markets)
    Final Decision, 77 F.C.C.2d 384 on reconsid., 84 F.C.C.2d 50 (1980), 88 F.C.C.2d 512 (1981), afrd sub nom
    • Computer & Communications Indus. Ass'n v. FCC