William Johannsen and the genotype concept

@article{Churchill1974WilliamJA,
  title={William Johannsen and the genotype concept},
  author={Frederick B. Churchill},
  journal={Journal of the History of Biology},
  year={1974},
  volume={7},
  pages={5-30}
}
  • F. Churchill
  • Published 1974
  • Art
  • Journal of the History of Biology
Recent secondary literature on the rise of modern genetics has begun to drag out of the shadows of historical neglect one of the major accomplishments in the history of biology. I refer to the conceptual distinction drawn between "phenotypes" and "genotypes," the use, if not the full meaning of which was fashioned in 1909 by Wilhelm Johannsen. Vorzimmer in his study of Darwin's later years has indicated how unaware Darwin and his contemporaries were of this distinction.' Both Allen and I have… 
The holist tradition in twentieth century genetics. Wilhelm Johannsen's genotype concept
TLDR
This paper shows how Johannsen's holistic genotype theory provided a platform for criticism of narrowly genocentric versions of the chromosome theory of heredity that came to dominate genetics in the middle decades of the twentieth century.
Sources of Wilhelm Johannsen’s Genotype Theory
TLDR
The historical background and early formation of Wilhelm Johannsen’s distinction between genotype and phenotype is described to correct this reading of the 1903 monograph by showing how its problems and results grow out of Johannsen's earlier work in heredity and plant breeding.
The Battling Botanist: Daniel Trembly MacDougal, Mutation Theory, and the Rise of Experimental Evolutionary Biology in America, 1900-1912
TLDR
This article investigates how de Vries's mutation theory gave the experimental biologist scientific authority in a particular institutional and national context and recast some of the arguments advanced in the literature.
Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype-Phenotype Distinction
TLDR
The meaning and significance of the genotype-phenotype distinction has been a topic of debate—among Johannsen's contemporaries, later biological theorists, and historians of science—many consider the distinction to be one of the conceptual pillars of twentieth century genetics.
Wilhelm Johannsen's Genotype-Phenotype Distinction
TLDR
The meaning and significance of the genotype-phenotype distinction has been a topic of debate—among Johannsen's contemporaries, later biological theorists, and historians of science—many consider the distinction to be one of the conceptual pillars of twentieth century genetics.
Heredity, development and evolution: the unmodern synthesis of E.S. Russell
TLDR
This study shows that Russell's synthesis was not rooted in the classic pantheon of towering figures in the history of biology, i.e. Darwin, Wallace, and Mendel, but was based on the teachings of Kant, Goethe, Cuvier, von Baer, and Müller.
T. H. Morgan and the Influence of Mechanistic Materialism on the Development of the Gene Concept 1910–1940
TLDR
It is argued that the hardening of the fundamental unit of heredity championed by Morgan and especially his followers, had profound implications for the fields of genetics, embryology and evolution right down to the present day.
Hybrids, pure cultures, and pure lines: from nineteenth-century biology to twentieth-century genetics.
  • S. Müller-Wille
  • Biology
    Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences
  • 2007
...
1
2
3
4
5
...