William Henry, Duke of Gloucester (1689–1700), son of Queen Anne (1665–1714), could have ruled Great Britain

@article{Holmes2008WilliamHD,
  title={William Henry, Duke of Gloucester (1689–1700), son of Queen Anne (1665–1714), could have ruled Great Britain},
  author={Grace E. Holmes and F F Holmes},
  journal={Journal of Medical Biography},
  year={2008},
  volume={16},
  pages={44 - 51}
}
Summary Hope for continuation of the Stuart dynasty in Britain ended with the death, from pneumonia in 1700, of the 11-year-old son of Princess Anne and Prince George, William Henry Duke of Gloucester. Considered by some to have been physically and mentally unfit to reign, careful examination of primary source materials shows him to have been a bright and interesting boy with mild hydrocephalus. Had he lived, he could have ruled. 
2 Citations

Figures from this paper

Queen Anne (1665–1714) and her health

  • J. Ross
  • Medicine
    Journal of medical biography
  • 2015
The contemporary records of Queen Anne's health and disease are reviewed, including the strange diagnoses made and the treatments prescribed. A correct diagnosis is suggested.

Diagnosing the dead: the retrospective analysis of genetic diseases.

  • A. Rushton
  • Medicine
    The journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh
  • 2013
An approach to such a medical-historical analysis including assessment of hereditary predisposition, family history and the use of DNA technology to confirm or deny the clinical suspicions of the investigator is outlined.

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES

For the want of an heir: the obstetrical history of Queen Anne.

Queen Anne had 17 recorded pregnancies but failed to leave an heir to the throne, and the succession passed to the Elector of Hanover, who became George I of England, and recent discoveries now enable a coherent scientific explanation, linking this loss with her other illnesses.

The Sickly Stuarts—the Medical Downfall of a Dynasty

It is shown that the failure of the Stuart dynasty to last beyond 1714 was entirely due to ill-health and medical misadventure, as well as bad luck.

Childbirth in ancient Rome: From traditional folklore to obstetrics

  • D. Todman
  • Medicine
    The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology
  • 2007
In ancient Rome, childbirth was a hazardous event for both mother and child with high rates of infant and maternal mortality, but with the development of Hippocratic medicine came significant advances in the care of women during pregnancy and confinement.