Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class

  title={Why you can't cite Wikipedia in my class},
  author={Neil L. Waters},
  journal={Commun. ACM},
The online encyclopedia's method of adding information risks conflating facts with popular opinion. 

Topics from this paper

What We Know About Wikipedia: A Review of the Literature Analyzing the Project(s)
This article proposes a review of the literature analyzing Wikipedia as a collective system for producing knowledge. JEL Classification: L39, L86, H41, D71
Why I Love/Hate Wikipedia: Reflections upon (Not Quite) Subjugated Knowledges
Wikipedia is a well-known online encyclopedia, whose content is contributed and edited by volunteers. Its use by students for their research is, to be polite, controversial. Is Wikipedia really evil,Expand
Wikipedia and the ecosystem of knowledge
This paper suggests academics contribute to articles in their field and use Wikipedia as a course assignment and make sure that the topics related to their discipline are fairly presented in this encyclopedia. Expand
Teachers' Use of Wikipedia with Their Students.
One of the most impressive phenomena in the creation and dissemination of human knowledge in recent years is Wikipedia, an encyclopedia written collaboratively by Web users. Nevertheless, teachersExpand
Lifting the veil: improving accountability and social transparency in Wikipedia with wikidashboard
A social dynamic analysis tool called WikiDashboard is described which aims to improve social transparency and accountability on Wikipedia articles, and early reactions from users suggest that the increased transparency afforded by the tool can improve the interpretation, communication, and trustworthiness of Wikipedia articles. Expand
A Brief Review of Studies of Wikipedia in Peer-Reviewed Journals
  • Chitu Okoli
  • Computer Science
  • 2009 Third International Conference on Digital Society
  • 2009
This paper reviews studies of Wikipedia that have been published in peer-reviewed journals and major sub-streams of research covered include: how and why Wikipedia works; assessments of the reliability of its content; using it as a data source for various studies; and applications of Wikipedia in different domains of endeavour. Expand
Transparency and social responsibility issues for Wikipedia
Wikipedia is known as a free online encyclopedia. Wikipedia uses largely transparent writing and editing processes, which aim at providing the user with quality information through a democraticExpand
Wikipedia research and tools: Review and comments
An overview of Wikipedia and wiki research and tools is given, which serves to describe some key areas of research. Expand
The wiki defense: contesting the status of knowledge in the floyd Landis doping case.
This theoretical essay applies active audience theory, convergence theory, and contemporary understandings of Web logs to an analysis of knowledge production in the antidoping movement. Using theExpand
Accuracy and quality in historical representation: Wikipedia, textbooks and the Investiture Controversy
The article compares Wikipedia’s entry on the Investiture Controversy to current scholarship and textbook treatments of the theme and argues that accuracy may be only one component of overall quality. Expand


Can History Be Open Source? Wikipedia and the Future of the Past
History is a deeply individualistic craft. The singly authored work is the standard for the profession; only about 6 percent of the more than 32,000 scholarly works indexed since 2000 in thisExpand
Can history be open source
  • Journal of American History
  • 2006
Waters (nwaters@middlebury.edu) is a professor of history and the Kawashima Professor of Japanese Studies in the Department of History at Middlebury College
  • Waters (nwaters@middlebury.edu) is a professor of history and the Kawashima Professor of Japanese Studies in the Department of History at Middlebury College