• DOI:10.1007/S000160050015
• Corpus ID: 51825180

Why was Relativity Accepted?

@article{Brush1999WhyWR,
  title={Why was Relativity Accepted?},
  author={Stephen G. Brush},
  journal={Physics in Perspective},
  year={1999},
  volume={1},
  pages={184-214}
}

• S. Brush
• Published 1 June 1999
• Physics
• Physics in Perspective

Historians of science have published many studies of the reception of Einstein’s special and general theories of relativity. Based on a review of these studies, and my own research on the role of the light-bending prediction in the reception of general relativity, I discuss the role of three kinds of reasons for accepting relativity: (1) empirical predictions and explanations; (2) social-psychological factors; and (3) aesthetic-mathematical factors. According to the historical studies, acceptance was a three-stage process. First, a few leading scientists adopted the special theory for aesthetic-mathematical reasons. In the second stage, their enthusiastic advocacy persuaded other scientists to work on the theory and apply it to problems currently of interest in atomic physics. The special theory was accepted by many German physicists by 1910 and had begun to attract some interest in other countries. In the third stage, the confirmation of Einstein’s light-bending prediction attracted much public attention and forced all physicists to take the general theory of relativity seriously. In addition to light-bending, the explanation of the advance of Mercury’s perihelion was considered strong evidence by theoretical physicists. The American astronomers who conducted successful tests of general relativity became defenders of the theory. There is little evidence that relativity was “socially constructed” but its initial acceptance was facilitated by the prestige and resources of its advocates.