Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity

@article{Kastner2005WhyTA,
  title={Why the Afshar experiment does not refute complementarity},
  author={Ruth E. Kastner},
  journal={Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics},
  year={2005},
  volume={36},
  pages={649-658}
}
  • R. Kastner
  • Published 2 February 2005
  • Physics
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
On Visibility in the Afshar Two-Slit Experiment
A modified version of Young’s experiment by Shahriar Afshar indirectly reveals the presence of a fully articulated interference pattern prior to the post-selection of a particle in a “which-slit”
LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF THE BOHR COMPLEMENTARITY PRINCIPLE IN AFSHAR'S EXPERIMENT UNDER THE NAFL INTERPRETATION
The NAFL (non-Aristotelian finitary logic) interpretation of quantum mechanics requires that no "physical" reality can be ascribed to the wave nature of the photon. The NAFL theory QM, formalizing
Complementarity Paradox Solved: Surprising Consequences
Afshar et al. claim that their experiment shows a violation of the complementarity inequality. In this work, we study their claim using a modified Mach-Zehnder setup that represents a simpler version
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Decoherence is like capitalism. Its proponents regard it as obvious, given human nature, and its success seems overwhelming. Competitors largely belong to the past, or get the impression they do.
A Bohmian Analysis Of Afshar's Experiment
This work is about Bohmian mechanics, a non-relativistic quantum theory about the motion of particles and their trajectories, named after its inventor David Bohm (Bohm,1952). This mechanics resolves
Wave Particle Duality and the Afshar Experiment
In an interesting series of articles published few years ago Afshar and coworkers [1,2] reported an optical experiment in which they claimed to refute the well known N. Bohr principle of
Why Kastner analysis does not apply to a modified Afshar experiment
In an analysis of the Afshar experiment R.E. Kastner points out that the selection system used in this experiment randomly separates the photons that go to the detectors, and therefore no which-way
Critique of Quantum Optical Experimental Refutations of Bohr’s Principle of Complementarity, of the Wootters–Zurek Principle of Complementarity, and of the Particle–Wave Duality Relation
I argue that quantum optical experiments that purport to refute Bohr’s principle of complementarity (BPC) fail in their aim. Some of these experiments try to refute complementarity by refuting the so
Ether, the Theory of Relativity and Quantum Physics
In this paper we revisit some of the reasons given by Einstein that resulted in his change of mind about the ether from denying to defending its existence. The ether proposed by Einstein we call
Complementarity Revisited
Complementarity can be considered as the weirdest idea associated with quantum mechanics. For Bohr, Complementarity is important in order to be able to convey successfully the non-classical features
...
1
2
3
...

References

SHOWING 1-4 OF 4 REFERENCES
The transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics
John G. Cramer Department of Physics FM 15, -University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195 and Bereich Kernund Strahlenphysik, Hahn-Meitner-Institut f'ur Kernforschung, 0-1000 Berlin 39 The
Quantum theory and measurement
The forty-nine papers collected here illuminate the meaning of quantum theory as it is disclosed in the measurement process. Together with an introduction and a supplemental annotated bibliography,