Why people prefer unequal societies

  title={Why people prefer unequal societies},
  author={Christina Starmans and Mark Sheskin and Paul Bloom},
  journal={Nature Human Behaviour},
There is immense concern about economic inequality, both among the scholarly community and in the general public, and many insist that equality is an important social goal. However, when people are asked about the ideal distribution of wealth in their country, they actually prefer unequal societies. We suggest that these two phenomena can be reconciled by noticing that, despite appearances to the contrary, there is no evidence that people are bothered by economic inequality itself. Rather, they… 

When and why is economic inequality seen as fair

Inequality and Fairness: A Networked Experiment

Why do humans cooperate? Lab experiments have found that cooperation may emerge in part because humans have intrinsically egalitarian motives, meaning that they resist inequality even at some

Judgments of Economic Fairness Are Based More on Perceived Economic Mobility Than Perceived Inequality

Are judgments of the fairness of the American economy based on perceptions of economic inequality, mobility, or both? In two experiments, the authors varied information on levels of U.S. inequality

Do People Want More Wealth and Status in Unequal Societies?

This chapter discusses the impact that economic inequality has on people’s desire for wealth and status. We first review three major perspectives from previous work suggesting a potential association

Distributive Justice Beliefs are Guided by Whether People Think the Ultimate Goal of Society is Well-Being or Power

Abstract Disagreements about how resources should be distributed are often heated, perhaps because people suspect that distributive justice beliefs that clash with their own derive from nefarious

But That’s Not Fair! The Experience of Economic Inequality from a Child’s Perspective

The twenty-first century is witnessing a rapid rise in concern regarding wealth inequality and the fairness of our economic systems. Alongside this concern, research is uncovering the detrimental

Theorizing the impact of fairness perceptions on the demand for redistribution

  • L. Ahrens
  • Economics
    Political Research Exchange
  • 2019
ABSTRACT Prior research shows that fairness judgements regarding the income distribution have a substantive impact on redistribution preferences. Those who perceive incomes as unfair demand more

What predicts perceived economic inequality? The roles of actual inequality, system justification, and fairness considerations.

It was found that legitimation of inequality was associated with less perceived inequality six years later, whereas unfairness wasassociated with more perceived inequality five years later and in more unequal areas, people perceived less income inequality.



Unequality: Who Gets What and Why It Matters

Who should get what, and what are the consequences? Economic inequality in the United States has been rising for decades, yet only recently have behavioral scientists explored two central questions

A Choice Mind-Set Increases the Acceptance and Maintenance of Wealth Inequality

It is shown that highlighting the concept of choice makes people less disturbed by facts about existing wealth inequality in the United States, more likely to underestimate the role of societal factors in individuals’ successes, less likely to support the redistribution of educational resources, and lesslikely to support raising taxes on the rich—even if doing so would help resolve a budget deficit crisis.

Fair Is Not Fair Everywhere

It is shown that children from three different cultures have very different ideas about distributive justice, and some basic notions of distributiveJustice are not universal intuitions of the human species but rather culturally constructed behavioral norms.

Judgments of Social Justice: Compromises Between Equality and Efficiency

Political economists agree that a trade-offexists between equality and efficiency. Using a hypothetical society paradigm, we manipulated the mean income (representing efficiency) and income

The ontogeny of fairness in seven societies

This work examines how fairness behaviour develops in children from seven diverse societies, testing children from 4 to 15 years of age in a standardized resource decision task and shows that disadvantageous inequity aversion emerged across all populations by middle childhood.

Fairness and the Development of Inequality Acceptance

It is found that as children enter adolescence, they increasingly view inequalities reflecting differences in individual achievements, but not luck, as fair, whereas efficiency considerations mainly play a role in late adolescence.

Children discard a resource to avoid inequity.

The existence of inequity aversion in children is demonstrated, a new method for studying inequity avoidance specifically is provided, and the need for new models to explain why inequity appetite may have evolved is suggested.

The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion

In "The Righteous Mind", psychologist Jonathan Haidt answers some of the most compelling questions about human relationships: Why can it sometimes feel as though half the population is living in a

Egalitarianism in young children

It is shown that young children’s other-regarding preferences assume a particular form, inequality aversion that develops strongly between the ages of 3 and 8, which indicates that human egalitarianism and parochialism have deep developmental roots.

Markets, Religion, Community Size, and the Evolution of Fairness and Punishment

Fairness is measured in thousands of individuals from 15 contemporary, small-scale societies to gain an understanding of the evolution of trustworthy exchange among human societies and shows that market integration positively covaries with fairness while community size positively covary with punishment.