Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services

@inproceedings{Sehm2013WhyNB,
  title={Why non-invasive brain stimulation should not be used in military and security services},
  author={Bernhard Sehm and Patrick Ragert},
  booktitle={Front. Hum. Neurosci.},
  year={2013}
}
In a recent review article by LevasseurMoreau et al. (2013), the authors discussed the effects of non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) on cognitive functions and proposed a potential application of NIBS in security or military personnel. We believe that this research endeavor is questionable since it might disclose several scientific as well as ethical concerns. In the following, we highlight our reservations about the potential use of NIBS in army and/or security services. Over the past… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 46 times over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 23 references

Introducing graph theory

  • M A.
  • 2011
Highly Influential
8 Excerpts

Anodal stimulation

  • J. Bell
  • 2012

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…