Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial.

@article{Roman2009WhyLA,
  title={Why laparoscopic adhesiolysis should not be the victim of a single randomized clinical trial.},
  author={Horatiu Roman and Tara F Hulsey and Lo{\"i}c Marpeau and Thomas C. Hulsey},
  journal={American journal of obstetrics and gynecology},
  year={2009},
  volume={200 2},
  pages={136.e1-4}
}
Randomized controlled trials may provide erroneous conclusions when the null hypothesis is not rejected because of insufficient analysis statistical power. The authors dispute the conclusion of a randomized controlled trial that compared chronic pain relief rates following laparoscopic adhesiolysis and diagnostic laparoscopy and recommended abandoning… CONTINUE READING