Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)

@article{Gingras2009WhyIH,
  title={Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)},
  author={Yves Gingras and Matthew L. Wallace},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2009},
  volume={82},
  pages={401-412}
}
We propose a comprehensive bibliometric study of the profile of Nobel Prize winners in chemistry and physics from 1901 to 2007, based on citation data available over the same period. The data allows us to observe the evolution of the profiles of winners in the years leading up to—and following—nominations and awarding of the Nobel Prize. The degree centrality and citation rankings in these fields confirm that the Prize is awarded at the peak of the winners’ citation history, despite a brief… CONTINUE READING
Recent Discussions
This paper has been referenced on Twitter 1 time over the past 90 days. VIEW TWEETS

From This Paper

Figures, tables, and topics from this paper.
18 Citations
19 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 18 extracted citations

References

Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 19 references

A method of predicting Nobel prizewinners in chemistry

  • S. V. Ashton, C. Oppenheim
  • Social Studies of Science,
  • 1978
Highly Influential
3 Excerpts

The 1984 Nobel physics prize for heterogeneous engineering

  • J. Maclachlan
  • 2001

The politics of excellence: Behind the Nobel Prize in science

  • R. M. Friedman
  • 2001
3 Excerpts

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…