Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)

@article{Gingras2009WhyIH,
  title={Why it has become more difficult to predict Nobel Prize winners: a bibliometric analysis of nominees and winners of the chemistry and physics prizes (1901–2007)},
  author={Yves Gingras and Matthew L. Wallace},
  journal={Scientometrics},
  year={2009},
  volume={82},
  pages={401-412}
}
We propose a comprehensive bibliometric study of the profile of Nobel Prize winners in chemistry and physics from 1901 to 2007, based on citation data available over the same period. The data allows us to observe the evolution of the profiles of winners in the years leading up to—and following—nominations and awarding of the Nobel Prize. The degree centrality and citation rankings in these fields confirm that the Prize is awarded at the peak of the winners’ citation history, despite a brief… Expand
At what institutions did Nobel laureates do their prize-winning work? An analysis of biographical information on Nobel laureates from 1994 to 2014
TLDR
This study examined the institutions (and countries) the Nobel laureates of the three disciplines chemistry, physics and physiology/medicine were affiliated with (from 1994 to 2014) when they did the decisive research work and showed that the USA dominated as a country. Expand
How Winning an International Scientific Award Affects Publishing Behavior of Laureates: the Case of Derek de Solla Price Medal in Scientometrics
This research aims to investigate the effect of the Derek de Solla Price memorial award reception on publishing behavior of medalists through comparing their research performance in 5 years beforeExpand
Identifying prize-winning scientists by a competition-aware ranking
TLDR
This work proposes a particular way of ranking scholars by computing the evaluated scholar's share on each year's citations which quantifies how the scholar fares in competition with the others, and shows that this method significantly outperforms other ranking methods in identifying the prize laureates. Expand
A Simple Index for the High-Citation Tail of Citation Distribution to Quantify Research Performance in Countries and Institutions
TLDR
The x-index, which is calculated from the number of national articles in the top 1% and 0.1% ofhighly cited papers and has a subtractive term to discount highly cited papers that are not scientific breakthroughs, is a simple and precise indicator for high research performance. Expand
Relation of early career performance and recognition to the probability of winning the Nobel Prize in economics
TLDR
Three analyses provide strong support for the notion that winning the JBCM is related to receiving the Nobel Prize, the award of which is also correlated with early career performance success as measured by number of publications and citations. Expand
Evolution of three Nobel Prize themes and a Nobel snub theme in chemistry: a bibliometric study with focus on international collaboration
TLDR
For all four themes, especially for Brunauer–Emmett–Teller equation, the publication volumes increase considerably from the earliest period to the later periods, and the international collaboration rate shows an increasing trend for each theme. Expand
On the “Missing Letter” to Lattes and the Nobel Prize in Physics
We briefly discuss the myth of a possible missing letter from Bohr to Lattes and show the only content of the Bohr archives concerning the Brazilian physicist. We also analyze and discuss the NobelExpand
The ripple effect: Citation chain reactions of a nobel prize
TLDR
A ripple effect is documented in which the awarding of the Nobel Prize ignites a citation chain reaction to Aumann's scientific ouvre and to the references in its nearest citation network. Expand
Do Nobel Laureates Create Prize-Winning Networks? An Analysis of Collaborative Research in Physiology or Medicine
TLDR
New insights are suggested into the role "star scientists" in social networks and the production of scientific discoveries by examining productivity, impact, coauthorship, and international collaboration patterns embedded within research networks. Expand
’ status and the perceived quality of their work : measuring citation sentiment change in Nobel papers
Prior research in status ordering has used numeric indicators to examine the impact of a status change on the perception of a scientist’s work. This study measures the perception change directly asExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 26 REFERENCES
Are the 1979 Prizewinners of Nobel Class?
  • 1998
Part of the process of scientific discovery is linguistic. It is not only necessary for scientists to observe and discover phenomena, but also to name them. Thus, the coining of new termsExpand
Of Nobel class: A citation perspective on high impact research authors
TLDR
If quantitative rankings of highly cited research authors confirm Nobel prize awards, a simple, quantitative, and objective algorithm based on citation data can effectively corroborate — and even forecast — a complex, qualitative, and subjective selection process based on human judgement. Expand
Mapping the Changing Centrality of Physicists (1900-1944)
This paper contributes to historical bibliometrics in proposing to apply social networks methodology and the concept of centrality to co-citation networks. Using the case of physics for the periodExpand
A Method of Predicting Nobel Prizewinners in Chemistry
TLDR
A study was carried out to test Garfield's claim that citation counting can be used to predict Nobel prizewinners, and found that receipt of the Nobel Prize is indeed correlated with citation counts, but that it is more strongly correlated with the number of papers co- authored in which the senior author's name is not the first in the list of authors. Expand
The Nobel prize in physics - regularities and tendencies
TLDR
It is shown that the time-interval between the discovery and its recognition can be approximately described by a lognormal distribution. Expand
The Beginnings of the Nobel Institution. The Science Prizes, 1901-1915
Acknowledgments Introduction 1. Precursors to the Nobel prizes in the sciences 2. Developments in Swedish and international science having a bearing on the Nobel institution 3. Implementing the willExpand
Defining physics: The Nobel Prize selection process, 1901–1937
The great prestige of the Nobel Prizes has come virtually to define physics in the public mind. An examination of the nominations and the selections in the first 37 years of Nobel awards shows thatExpand
Nobel laureates: Their publication productivity, collaboration and authorship status
TLDR
The review of the conceptual or philosophical foundations for the measurement of science offers an in-depth examination, resulting in the correlation of these foundations with the metrics used to measure science and its outcomes. Expand
The 1984 Nobel Physics Prize for Heterogeneous Engineering
The 1984 Nobel Prize for physics wasawarded to two European scientists for theircontributions to the `large project' that ledto the identification of two importantfundamental particles. The citationExpand
Henry Dale's Nobel Prize Winning `Discovery'
TLDR
This paper explores the process by which Henry Dale became recognized as the discoverrer of the chemical transmission ofnerve impulses and compares the explanatorypower of the story of individual creativity with a story that highlights the interaction between a scientist and his environment. Expand
...
1
2
3
...