Why do females care more than males?

  title={Why do females care more than males?},
  author={David C. Queller},
  journal={Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences},
  pages={1555 - 1557}
  • D. Queller
  • Published 22 November 1997
  • Biology
  • Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences
Females tend to provide more parental care than males. Previous efforts to account for this have been confused because it is difficult to express the costs of care for males and females in the same currency. Here I propose a null model that does so, using the Fisherian constraint that total male and female reproduction must be equal. The model shows that, contrary to a number of recent analyses, lower probability of parentage for males does tend to make males less likely than females to provide… 
Stability and value of male care for offspring: is it worth only half the trouble?
A game theory model is presented that finds that the source of deserting males' additional matings is irrelevant to the evolutionary stability of male care and rejects the claim that fitness gains through male care are intrinsically less valuable than those through desertion.
Sexual selection favours male parental care, when females can choose
  • S. Alonzo
  • Biology, Psychology
    Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
  • 2011
It is shown that inter-sexual selection can drive the evolution of male care when females are able to bias mating or paternity towards parental males, and surprisingly, female choice for parental males allows male care to evolve despite low relatedness between the male and the offspring in his care.
Partial paternity does not always select for female‐biased care
The conditions under which male care may be selected despite partial paternity and complete maternity are derived, and it is predicted that selection for male care is possible.
It takes two to tango.
Male care and life history traits in mammals
It is proposed that males provide an energetic contribution during the most expensive time of female reproduction, lactation, and that different male care behaviours increase female fecundity, which in turn helps males offset the costs of caring.
Why Males Compete Rather Than Care, with an Application to Supplying Collective Goods.
A simple dynamic model is presented to investigate the benefits of these two alternative fitness-enhancing pathways and demonstrates that allocation to competition gives males greater fitness than offspring care for a range of circumstances that are dependent on life-history parameters and, for the large-game hunting application, frequency dependent.
Sexual Selection in Males and Females
It is shown that both intrasexual competition between females and male choice of mating partners are common, leading to strong sexual selection in females and, in extreme cases, to reversals in the usual pattern of sex differences in behavior and morphology.
Male lactation: why, why not and is it care?
Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios
An integrative model shows how factors interact to generate sex roles and underscores the need to distinguish between the ASR and the operational sex ratio (OSR) if mortality is higher when caring than competing this diminishes the likelihood of sex role divergence.
Individual variation in parental care drives divergence of sex roles
It is argued that all these results are caused by the emergence of individual variation in parental care strategies, a factor that was hitherto largely neglected in sex-role evolution theory.


Chance can produce a sex difference in variance in mating success and explain Bateman's data
Potential Reproductive Rates and the Operation of Sexual Selection
This framework for relating sex differences in mating competition to the operational sex ratio, potential reproductive rates, and parental expenditure differs from Triver's concept of the relation between parental investment and mating competition in three ways.
Paternity and the evolution of male parental care.
Indiscriminate altruism: unduly nice parents and siblings.
  • L. Keller
  • Biology
    Trends in ecology & evolution
  • 1997
Parental investment: A prospective analysis
Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila.
Epigamic selection includes the major part of what Darwin meant by sexual selection, and is introduced to apply to characters which increased the fertility of a given mating and therefore had a selective value for the species as a whole.
Sex and evolution.
This book explores the relationship between various types of reproduction and the evolutionary process. Starting with the concept of meiosis, George C. Williams states the conditions under which an
The origin and evolution of gamete dimorphism and the male-female phenomenon.
Parental investment and sexual selection
The p,cnetics of sex nas now becn clarif ied, and Fishcr ( 1958 ) hrs produccd , n,od"l to cxplarn sex ratios at coDception, a nrodel recently extendcd to include special mccha_ nisms that operate under inbreeding (Hunrilron I96?).
The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection
Although it is true that most text-books of genetics open with a chapter on biometry, closer inspection will reveal that this has little connexion with the body of the work, and that more often than not it is merely belated homage to a once fashionable study.