Why do clinicians choose the therapies and techniques they do? Exploring clinical decision-making via treatment selections in dysphagia practice

@article{McCurtin2017WhyDC,
  title={Why do clinicians choose the therapies and techniques they do? Exploring clinical decision-making via treatment selections in dysphagia practice},
  author={Arlene McCurtin and Chiara Healy},
  journal={International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology},
  year={2017},
  volume={19},
  pages={69 - 76}
}
Abstract Purpose: Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) are assumed to use evidence-based practice to inform treatment decisions. However, the reasoning underpinning treatment selections is not well known. Understanding why SLPs choose the treatments they do may be clarified by exploring the reasoning tied to specific treatments such as dysphagia interventions. Method: An electronic survey methodology was utilised. Participants were accessed via the gatekeepers of two national dysphagia special… Expand
Do stroke clinical practice guideline recommendations for the intervention of thickened liquids for aspiration support evidence based decision making? A systematic review and narrative synthesis
TLDR
Despite the limited evidence base for the thickened liquid intervention, there was consensus among stroke guidelines in recommending it, suggesting less than satisfactory evidence‐based practices in formulating recommendations. Expand
Evaluating the Use of Oral Trials for Inpatient Dysphagia Management: An Initial Cross-Sectional Database Study.
TLDR
This article begins to evidence the use of a dysphagia therapy not previously explored within existing literature by exploring three main aspects to identify the patient demographics and environments in which oral trials are used in hospital, and explore clinical decision making around the approach. Expand
Moving Beyond Traditional Understandings of Evidence-Based Practice: A Total Evidence and Knowledge Approach (TEKA) to Treatment Evaluation and Clinical Decision Making in Speech-Language Pathology.
TLDR
It is proposed that the evaluation of interventions would be better supported by an explicit knowledge management approach reflecting a range of evidence and knowledge. Expand
A preliminary survey of dysphagia practice patterns among speech-language pathologists in India
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to survey and describe dysphagia practice patterns among speech-language pathologists (SLPs) in India, where no standardized practice pattern guidelinesExpand
Thickened liquids: do they still have a place in the dysphagia toolkit?
TLDR
Clinical decision-making about thickened liquids can be improved by considering the evidence of clinically meaningful endpoints, promoting shared decision- making with patients and underpinning practice with knowledge about the complex relationship between dysphagia, aspiration and pneumonia. Expand
Contextualising clinical reasoning within the clinical swallow evaluation: A scoping review and expert consultation
  • Thiani Pillay, M. Pillay
  • Medicine
  • The South African journal of communication disorders = Die Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir Kommunikasieafwykings
  • 2021
TLDR
It was showed that the clinical swallow evaluation is a complex process with significant levels of variability usually linked to the impact of context, and healthcare practitioners must depend on clinical reasoning to make appropriate modifications to the assessment process that considers these salient factors. Expand
Plugging the patient evidence gap: what patients with swallowing disorders post-stroke say about thickened liquids.
TLDR
This qualitative, descriptive study exploring the experiences of individuals given thickened liquids after their stroke found that participants disliked TL and this dislike may have impacted clinically in terms of adherence, hydration and quality of life. Expand
Drooling in children with neurodisability: A survey of Australian speech–language pathologists’ practice
TLDR
Drooling was perceived to be a complex practice area for which SLPs desire additional education and Clinicians have limited evidence to support their practice: further research is needed to establish evidence-based treatments for drooling. Expand
Use of modified diets to prevent aspiration in oropharyngeal dysphagia: is current practice justified?
TLDR
There is no good evidence to date that thickening liquids reduces pneumonia in dysphagia and this intervention may be associated with reduced fluid intake, so there is an urgent need for better quality evidence regarding this intervention. Expand
Treating Childhood Speech Sound Disorders: Current Approaches to Management by Australian Speech-Language Pathologists.
TLDR
The findings revealed that SLPs often combine elements of four therapies: the minimal pairs approach, traditional articulatory approaches, auditory discrimination, and Cued Articulation. Expand
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 43 REFERENCES
What are the primary influences on treatment decisions? How does this reflect on evidence-based practice? Indications from the discipline of speech and language therapy.
TLDR
Factors influencing decision making did not clearly align with the four pillars of EBP, the principal influences being practice evidence and pragmatic constraints. Expand
'We don't have recipes; we just have loads of ingredients': explanations of evidence and clinical decision making by speech and language therapists.
TLDR
The findings emerging from the data reflect the complexities and paradoxes of clinical practice as described by SLTs, and show that treatment decisions are scaffolded primarily on practice evidence. Expand
Dysphagia Evaluation Practices of Speech and Language Therapists in Ireland: Clinical Assessment and Instrumental Examination Decision-Making
TLDR
The results showed clinician variability regarding which components are included in a bedside clinical examination of swallowing, with a high degree of consistency for only 11 of the 20 components. Expand
Accessing the evidence to treat the dysphagic patient: Can we get it? Is there time?
TLDR
Questions about the speech pathologist's exposure to and attitudes towards evidence-based healthcare in the management of patients with dysphagia are explored and suggestions for strategies that may assist the profession in ensuring anevidence-based practice are outlined. Expand
Dysphagia Evaluation Practices: Inconsistencies in Clinical Assessment and Instrumental Examination Decision-Making
TLDR
The results revealed that clinicians who responded to the survey differ somewhat regarding which components they include in a clinical examination of swallowing, and consistency of clinical decision-making (instrumental vs. non instrumental) given specific patient scenarios. Expand
Dysphagia therapy in stroke: a survey of speech and language therapists.
TLDR
This survey gives valuable insight into the direct dysphagia therapy practices of speech and language therapists based in the UK and Ireland working in stroke and highlights discrepancies between reported approaches and recommendations from existing evidence and clinical guidelines. Expand
Effects of Therapy in Oropharyngeal Dysphagia by Speech and Language Therapists: A Systematic Review
TLDR
A systematic review is given of the literature on the effects of therapy in oropharyngeal dysphagia carried out by speech therapists, and statistically significant positive therapy effects were found. Expand
Evidence-based systematic review: Oropharyngeal dysphagia behavioral treatments. Part II--impact of dysphagia treatment on normal swallow function.
TLDR
The behavioral treatments investigated were three postural interventions--side lying, chin tuck, and head rotation--and four swallowing maneuvers--effortful swallow, the Mendelsohn maneuver, supraglottic swallow, and super-supraglotti swallow. Expand
Survey of Usual Practice: Dysphagia Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer Patients
TLDR
A national internet-based survey was developed and disseminated to SLPs who treat head and neck cancer patients to gain an understanding of current usual practices and a lack of uniformity and consensus regarding best practices was apparent. Expand
Dysphagia treatment post stroke: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
TLDR
Emerging evidence is presented that nasogastric tube feeding is not associated with a higher risk of death compared to percutaneous feeding tubes; and general dysphagia therapy programmes are related with a reduced risk of pneumonia in the acute stage of stroke. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...