Why did the United States Invade Iraq in 2003?

@article{Butt2019WhyDT,
  title={Why did the United States Invade Iraq in 2003?},
  author={Ahsan I. Butt},
  journal={Security Studies},
  year={2019},
  volume={28},
  pages={250 - 285}
}
  • Ahsan I. Butt
  • Published 4 January 2019
  • Political Science
  • Security Studies
Abstract Why did the United States invade Iraq in 2003? Most scholars cite the nonproliferation of weapons of mass destruction (WMD), a neoconservative desire to spread democracy, or the placating of domestic interest groups as the Bush administration’s objectives, but I suggest these arguments are flawed. Instead, I proffer the “performative war” thesis resting on the concepts of status, reputation, and hierarchy to explain the Iraq war. Hegemons desire generalized deterrence, such that others… 
Cheater's Dilemma: Iraq, Weapons of Mass Destruction, and the Path to War
Between the 1991 Gulf War and the U.S.-led invasion in 2003, the Iraqi regime faced a cheater's dilemma: how much should it reveal of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) capabilities when each
A Neo-Orientalist Critique of 'Humanitarian Interventions' in Afghanistan in Rahman’s In the Light of What We Know
The Neo-orientalist strategy of neocons1 in Afghanistan is meant to subjugate neo-orients in the name of humanitarian assistance to fulfill their exploitative politico-economic agendas. Encompassing
NATO enlargement and US foreign policy: the origins, durability, and impact of an idea
Since the Cold War, NATO enlargement has moved from a contentious issue in US foreign policy debates to an accepted plank in US strategy. What explains this development—why has support for
Conceptualising a protection of liberal constitutionalism post 9/11: an emphasis upon rights in the social contract philosophy of Thomas Hobbes
  • I. Turner
  • Political Science
    The International Journal of Human Rights
  • 2020
ABSTRACT John Locke believed individuals covenanted with the state in return for security they had previously lacked in the state of nature. But in this bargain of protection, individuals still
From Liberal Statebuilding to Counterinsurgency and Stabilization: The International Intervention in Iraq
ABSTRACT Stabilization approaches have limited transformational ambitions, in particular when compared with previous large-scale peacebuilding interventions. The case of Iraq is illustrative of such
Illiberal and irrational? Trump and the challenge of liberal modernity in US foreign policy
Building on a growing body of literature on the application of Morgenthau’s ethics to post-Cold War US foreign policy, this article applies Morgenthau’s concept of irrationality to Trump’s foreign
The Status of Status in World Politics
ABSTRACT What is status? How does it work? What effects does it tend to have? A new wave of scholarship on status in international relations has converged on a central definition of status, several
Status Matters in World Politics
This article explores the burgeoning literature on status in world politics. Toward that end, it reviews three recently published books. The three books are representative of the different
Obama’s Foreign Policy and the Arab Spring: The Cases of Egypt, Libya, and Syria
This chapter covers Barack Obama’s foreign policy in the Eastern Mediterranean and in particular in three main cases of the Arab Spring: Egypt, Libya, and Syria. There are many reasons why I have
Dispute inflation
  • Todd H. Hall
  • Business
    European Journal of International Relations
  • 2021
Much work has examined the phenomenon of dispute escalation, whereby the concrete measures state actors take edge them closer to war. Less attention has been devoted to the ways in which state
...
1
2
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 59 REFERENCES
War and Decision: Inside the Pentagon at the Dawn of the War on Terrorism
Feith details how the Administration launched a global effort to attack and disrupt terrorist networks; how it decided to overthrow the Saddam Hussein regime by force; how it came to impose an
State vs. Defense: The Battle to Define America's Empire
In the tradition of The Wise Men, The Best and the Brightest, Legacy of Ashes, and The Dead Hand, State vs. Defense explores how and why American leaders succumbed to the sirens of militarism, how
Status fixations, the need for ‘firmness’, and decisions for war
According to a recent monograph on the Great War’s origins, the July crisis of 1914 may very well be ‘the most complex event of modern times’.1 Hence, it is next to impossible to track all the causal
Rage of Honor: Entente Indignation and the Lost Chance for Peace in the First World War
Why the First World War ended in 1918 and not earlier remains a major puzzle. We propose a new theory that emphasizes how honor prolongs wars beyond what rationalist theories can explain. It argues
Status Deficits and War
Abstract Despite widespread agreement that status matters, there is relatively little in the way of focused research on how and when it matters. Relying on the assumption that it “matters” has
Humiliation and Third-Party Aggression
There is a growing consensus that status concerns drive state behavior. Although recent attention has been paid to when states are most likely to act on behalf of status concerns, very little is
The State of Deterrence in International Politics Today
In comparison with the Cold War era, deterrence in international politics has changed significantly, even though many of the basic components of that deterrence still exist and continue to have an
Unrest Assured: Why Unipolarity Is Not Peaceful
The United States has been at war for thirteen of the twenty-two years since the Cold War ended and the world became unipolar. Still, the consensual view among international relations theorists is
Power Transitions, Status Dissatisfaction, and War: The Sino-Japanese War of 1894–1895
ABSTRACT Although power transition theory offers a powerful model of international conflict, scholars have not adequately operationalized the theory's key variable of satisfaction/dissatisfaction
Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War
Most scholars hold that the consequences of unipolarity for great power conflict are indeterminate and that a power shift resulting in a return to bipolarity or multipolarity will not raise the
...
1
2
3
4
5
...