• DOI:10.1017/S0963180118000336
• Corpus ID: 58195676

Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.

@article{Agar2019WhyWS,
  title={Why We Should Defend Gene Editing as Eugenics.},
  author={Nicholas Agar},
  journal={Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees},
  year={2019},
  volume={28 1},
  pages={
          9-19
        }
}

• N. Agar
• Published 20 December 2018
• Medicine
• Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees

This paper considers the relevance of the concept of "eugenics,"-a term associated with some of the most egregious crimes of the twentieth century-to the possibility of editing human genomes. The author identifies some uses of gene editing as eugenics but proposes that this identification does not suffice to condemn them. He proposes that we should distinguish between "morally wrong" practices, which should be condemned, and "morally problematic" practices that call for solutions, and he suggests that eugenic uses of gene editing fall into this latter category. Although when we choose the characteristics of future people we are engaging in morally dangerous acts, some interventions in human heredity should nevertheless be acknowledged as morally good. These morally good eugenic interventions include some uses of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. The author argues that we should think about eugenic interventions in the same way that we think about morally problematic interventions in public health. When we recognize some uses of gene editing as eugenics, we make the dangers of selecting or modifying human genetic material explicit.