Why Tarsiers? Why Now? An Introduction to the Special Edition on Tarsiers

@article{Shekelle2010WhyTW,
  title={Why Tarsiers? Why Now? An Introduction to the Special Edition on Tarsiers},
  author={Myron Shekelle and Sharon L. Gursky},
  journal={International Journal of Primatology},
  year={2010},
  volume={31},
  pages={937-940}
}
The scientists studying tarsiers come from many different fields, use a variety of methods, and all too often publish in different journals. Though most are primatologists, they approach the study of tarsiers from the distinct perspective of their own disciplines. Rarely do they appreciate, or even cite, the studies of tarsiers from different disciplines that affect their own work. It is our hope that by gathering these articles together and publishing them in one issue, we will generate… 
Evolutionary morphology, cranial biomechanics and the origins of tarsiers and anthropoids
TLDR
A biomechanical model of forces acting on the enormous eyeballs and orbits of tarsiers especially during locomotion provides a strong counterargument to the Tarsier-Anthropoid Hypothesis and shows the tarsier septum is a form–function convergence on the small-eyed anthropoid condition.
Genome sequence of the basal haplorrhine primate Tarsius syrichta reveals unusual insertions
TLDR
A new genome assembly is presented of the Philippine tarsier (Tarsius syrichta), and extended analyses of the genome and detailed history of transposable element insertion events are provided to aid efforts to more fully understand the ancient characteristics of primate genomes.
Do functional demands associated with locomotor habitat, diet, and activity pattern drive skull shape evolution in musteloid carnivorans?
TLDR
Results show that phylogeny, locomotion and, diet strongly influence the shape of the skull, whereas the activity pattern seems to have a weakest influence, and that the locomotor environment is highly integrated with foraging and feeding, which can drive the evolution of skull shape in the same direction.