Corpus ID: 16065586

Why Quantitative Probability Assessments Are Empirically Justifiable in Foreign Policy Analysis

@inproceedings{Friedman2015WhyQP,
  title={Why Quantitative Probability Assessments Are Empirically Justifiable in Foreign Policy Analysis},
  author={J. Friedman and J. D. Baker and P. Tetlock and R. Zeckhauser},
  year={2015}
}
Aristotle counseled us to seek precision insofar as the nature of the subject permits. But how much is too much? This article provides the first systematic test of long-standing debates about how precisely foreign policy analysts can estimate probabilities. Using a data set of 888,328 forecasts drawn from a series of geopolitical forecasting tournaments, we demonstrate that qualitative probability assessments, including seven-step scales employed by U.S. intelligence analysts, systematically… Expand
1 Citations

Figures and Tables from this paper

Superforecasting reality check: Evidence from a small pool of experts and expedited identification
TLDR
Supportive empirical evidence from an experiment with an initial (small) pool of 314 experts and an identification phase of (just) 9 months is provided, and preliminary evidence that even an additional training of just 20 minutes, can influence positively the number of superforecasters identified is found. Expand

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES
The psychology of intelligence analysis: drivers of prediction accuracy in world politics.
TLDR
A profile of the best forecasters is developed; they were better at inductive reasoning, pattern detection, cognitive flexibility, and open-mindedness; they had greater understanding of geopolitics, training in probabilistic reasoning, and opportunities to succeed in cognitively enriched team environments. Expand
Accuracy of forecasts in strategic intelligence
  • D. Mandel, A. Barnes
  • Engineering, Medicine
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2014
Significance Forecasting is a vital part of strategic intelligence, offering policy makers indications about probable future conditions and aiding sound decision making. Nevertheless, there has notExpand
Change the Analyst and Not the System: A Different Approach to Intelligence Reform
Recent intelligence failures, including first and foremost the mistaken estimate of Iraq's weapons of mass destruction (WMD) prior to the war, show that a prime source of such failures is theExpand
Reducing Uncertainty: Intelligence Analysis and National Security
The US government spends billions of dollars every year to reduce uncertainty: to monitor and forecast everything from the weather to the spread of disease. In other words, we spend a lot of money toExpand
Towards a Reasonable Standard for Analysis: How Right, How Often on Which Issues?
This article takes the view that largely impossible standards have been imposed on intelligence analysis, largely for political reasons stemming from the 9/11 attacks and Iraqi WMD. The articleExpand
Motivated reasoning and verbal vs. numerical probability assessment: Evidence from an accounting context
A perplexing yet persistent empirical finding is that individuals assess probabilities in words and in numbers nearly equivalently, and theorists have called for future research to search for factorsExpand
Handling and Mishandling Estimative Probability: Likelihood, Confidence, and the Search for Bin Laden
In a series of reports and meetings in Spring 2011, intelligence analysts and officials debated the chances that Osama bin Laden was living in Abbottabad, Pakistan. Estimates ranged from a low of 30Expand
Communicating Uncertainty in Intelligence and Other Professions
Recent events have focused new attention on the need for intelligence professionals to present alternative hypotheses to policymakers in a way that makes clear the uncertainties in the evaluation andExpand
Superforecasting: The Art and Science of Prediction
A New York Times Bestseller An Economist Best Book of 2015 "The most important book on decision making since Daniel Kahneman's Thinking, Fast and Slow." Jason Zweig, The Wall Street Journal EveryoneExpand
Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know?
Author: Philip E. Tetlock is a psychologist who is Professor of Leadership at the Haas School of Business at the University of California, Berkeley. The book combines several of his researchExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...