Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching

@inproceedings{King2019WhyPS,
  title={Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used for Matching},
  author={Gillian King and Rasmus Nielsen},
  year={2019}
}
This paper is the Supplementary Appendix to Gary King and Richard Nielsen, “Why Propensity Scores Should Not Be Used For Matching,” copy at j.mp/psnot ∗Institute for Quantitative Social Science, Harvard University, 1737 Cambridge Street, Cambridge MA 02138; GaryKing.org, king@harvard.edu, (617) 500-7570. †Department of Political Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02139; mit.edu/∼rnielsen, rnielsen@mit.edu, (857) 998-8039. 1 PSM Approximates… CONTINUE READING

Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.
SHOWING 1-10 OF 103 CITATIONS, ESTIMATED 80% COVERAGE

The impact of mode of data collection on measures of subjective wellbeing

VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Double-adjustment in propensity score matching analysis: choosing a threshold for considering residual imbalance

  • BMC medical research methodology
  • 2017
VIEW 4 EXCERPTS
CITES METHODS & BACKGROUND
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

Outcome Based Matching

VIEW 6 EXCERPTS
CITES BACKGROUND & METHODS
HIGHLY INFLUENCED

FILTER CITATIONS BY YEAR

2013
2019

CITATION STATISTICS

  • 13 Highly Influenced Citations

  • Averaged 26 Citations per year from 2017 through 2019