Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching

@article{Kirschner2006WhyMG,
  title={Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching},
  author={P. Kirschner and J. Sweller and R. Clark},
  journal={Educational Psychologist},
  year={2006},
  volume={41},
  pages={75 - 86}
}
Evidence for the superiority of guided instruction is explained in the context of our knowledge of human cognitive architecture, expert–novice differences, and cognitive load. Although unguided or minimally guided instructional approaches are very popular and intuitively appealing, the point is made that these approaches ignore both the structures that constitute human cognitive architecture and evidence from empirical studies over the past half-century that consistently indicate that minimally… Expand
Student learning: what has instruction got to do with it?
Improving conceptual and procedural knowledge: The impact of instructional content within a mathematics lesson.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 156 REFERENCES
Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? The case for guided methods of instruction.
  • R. Mayer
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The American psychologist
  • 2004
Instructional Design in Technical Areas
The Equivalence of Learning Paths in Early Science Instruction
Antagonism Between Achievement and Enjoyment in ATI Studies
...
1
2
3
4
5
...