Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent

@article{Galinsky2008WhyIP,
  title={Why It Pays to Get Inside the Head of Your Opponent},
  author={Adam D. Galinsky and William W Maddux and Debra Gilin and Judith B. White},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2008},
  volume={19},
  pages={378 - 384}
}
The current research explored whether two related yet distinct social competencies—perspective taking (the cognitive capacity to consider the world from another individual's viewpoint) and empathy (the ability to connect emotionally with another individual)—have differential effects in negotiations. Across three studies, using both individual difference measures and experimental manipulations, we found that perspective taking increased individuals' ability to discover hidden agreements and to… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

When to Use Your Head and When to Use Your Heart
Four studies explored whether perspective-taking and empathy would be differentially effective in mixed-motive competitions depending on whether the critical skills for success were more cognitively
And sympathy is what we need my friend—Polite requests improve negotiation results
TLDR
The results inform both psycholinguistic research and negotiation research by demonstrating the causal role of linguistic cues in activating concept-knowledge relevant to different emotional experiences, and point to the down-the-line impact on shaping negotiation preferences.
The Psychological Logic of Peace Summits: How Empathy Shapes Outcomes of Diplomatic Negotiations
Why do some peace summits succeed while others fail? We offer an explanation that highlights the importance of empathy between leaders. Studies in negotiations and psychology show that empathy—the
It’s All About the Self
Although abundant research has documented positive interpersonal outcomes of perspective taking, a growing body of evidence indicates that perspective taking can also induce negative interpersonal
Perspective taking as a means to overcome motivational barriers in negotiations: when putting oneself into the opponent's shoes helps to walk toward agreements.
TLDR
The present research investigates negotiators' egoistic motivation as a determinant for the emergence of partial impasses, and proves that perspective taking serves as a powerful tool to avoid impasses and to overcome egoistic impediments.
Mental contrasting promotes integrative bargaining
Purpose – This paper aims to test the impact of several self‐regulatory strategies on an integrative bargaining task.Design/methodology/approach – Participants were randomly assigned to dyads and
I Expected More from You: The Influence of Close Relationships and Perspective Taking on Negotiation Offers
Three experimental studies show that interpersonal relationships influence the expectations of negotiators at the negotiation table. That is, negotiators expect more generous negotiation offers from
From Claiming to Creating Value: The Psychology of Negotiations on Common Resource Dilemmas
Current sustainability challenges often reflect common resource dilemmas where peoples’ short-term self-interests are at odds with collective interests in the present and future. In this article, we
Bottom-up influences in representative negotiations: How representatives affect intra-inter group relations
In this dissertation, I systematically studied bottom up influences of representative negotiation processes on intra-intergroup relations and made three main conclusions. The first is that contrary
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 37 REFERENCES
INFORMATION EXCHANGE, TOUGHNESS, AND INTEGRATIVE BARGAINING: THE ROLES OF EXPLICIT CUES AND PERSPECTIVE‐TAKING
Information exchange is a significant factor in the achievement of integrative agreements in negotiation. However, it is not clear what factors govern information exchange. While tutoring negotiators
First offers as anchors: the role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.
Three experiments explored the role of first offers, perspective-taking, and negotiator self-focus in determining distributive outcomes in a negotiation. Across 3 experiments, whichever party, the
Social perception in negotiation
Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma II: what if the target of empathy has defected?
What if participants in a one-trial prisoner's dilemma know before making their decision that the other person has already defected? From the perspective of classic game theory, a dilemma no longer
The Role of Perspective-Taking Ability in Negotiating under Different Forms of Arbitration
This study investigates whether the ability of negotiators to adopt the perspective of their opponents is a key to success in negotiating under conventional and final-offer arbitration. The authors
Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues.
This article examines the ability of the individual differences, motivational, and cognitive approaches of negotiation to account for empirical research on dyadic negotiation. Investigators have
Empathy-induced altruism in a prisoner's dilemma
Can empathy-induced altruism motivate a person to cooperate in a prisoner's dilemma? To answer this question, 60 undergraduate women were placed in a one-trial prisoner's dilemma, and empathy for the
Myopic Biases in Strategic Social Prediction: Why Deadlines Put Everyone Under More Pressure Than Everyone Else
  • D. Moore
  • Psychology
    Personality & social psychology bulletin
  • 2005
TLDR
Five experiments document biases in the way people predict the outcomes of interdependent social situations and show both how focusing can account for these effects and also how perspective taking can reduce their biasing influence.
Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: when compassion and justice conflict
Results of 2 experiments supported the proposal that empathy-induced altruism can lead one to act in a way that violates the moral principle of justice. In each experiment, participants were asked to
...
...