Why Constructive Relativity Fails

@article{Norton2008WhyCR,
  title={Why Constructive Relativity Fails},
  author={J. Norton},
  journal={The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science},
  year={2008},
  volume={59},
  pages={821 - 834}
}
  • J. Norton
  • Published 2008
  • Philosophy
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
Constructivists, such as Harvey Brown, urge that the geometries of Newtonian and special relativistic spacetimes result from the properties of matter. Whatever this may mean, it commits constructivists to the claim that these spacetime geometries can be inferred from the properties of matter without recourse to spatiotemporal presumptions or with few of them. I argue that the construction project only succeeds if constructivists antecedently presume the essential commitments of a realist… Expand
How could relativity be anything other than physical
Abstract Harvey Brown's Physical Relativity defends a view about the nature of spacetime, which he calls the dynamical perspective, that goes beyond the familiar dichotomy ofExpand
Quantum Dynamical Relativity and the Nature of Spacetime
Einstein's special theory of relativity starts with assumptions about how observations conducted in relatively moving inertial frames must compare. From these assumptions, conclusions can be drawnExpand
Explanation, analyticity and constitutive principles in spacetime theories
Abstract Much discussion was inspired by the publication of Harvey Brown's book Physical Relativity and the so-called dynamical approach to Special Relativity there advocated. At the center of theExpand
Substantivalist and Relationalist Approaches to Spacetime
Substantivalists believe that spacetime and its parts are fundamental constituents of reality. Relationalists deny this, claiming that spacetime enjoys only a derivative existence. I begin byExpand
Geometry, Fields, and Spacetime
I present an argument against a relational theory of spacetime that regards spacetime as a ‘structural quality of the field’. The argument takes the form of a trilemma. To make the argument, I focusExpand
Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance: The cart and the horse or two sides of a single coin?
Abstract Michel Janssen and Harvey Brown have driven a prominent recent debate concerning the direction of an alleged arrow of explanation between Minkowski spacetime and Lorentz invariance ofExpand
How to be a realist about Minkowski spacetime without believing in magical explanations
The question about the relation between spacetime structure and the symmetries of laws has received renewed attention in a recent discussion about the status of Minkowski spacetime in SpecialExpand
Regularity Relationalism and the Constructivist Project
  • S. Stevens
  • Mathematics
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2020
It has recently been argued (Stevens [2015]) that Harvey Brown and Oliver Pooley’s ‘dynamical approach’ to special relativity should be understood as what might be called an ontologically andExpand
Matter or geometry as fundamental in relativity theory: How not to teach special relativity
In this paper, I review a number of interpretational frameworks for relativistic phenomena like length contraction and relativity of simultaneity. Of central focus is the book Physical Relativity byExpand
Explanation, Geometry, and Conspiracy in Relativity Theory
I discuss the debate between dynamical versus geometrical approaches to spacetime theories, in the context of both special and general relativity, arguing that (a) the debate takes a substantiallyExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 14 REFERENCES
There's no pain in the FitzGerald contraction, is there?
It is well-known that Albert Einstein distinguished between theories of principle, such as thermodynamics, and constructive theories, such as statistical mechanics. It is somewhat less known thatExpand
Causation as Folk Science
I deny that the world is fundamentally causal, deriving the skepticism on non-Humean grounds from our enduring failures to find a contingent, universal principle of causality that holds true of ourExpand
The Ontology Of Spacetime
The sixteen papers collected in this volume are expanded and revised versions of talks delivered at the Second International Conference on the Ontology of Spacetime, organized by the InternationalExpand
Presentism and relativity
In this critical notice we argue against William Craig's recent attempt to reconcile presentism (roughly, the view that only the present is real) with relativity theory. Craig's defense of hisExpand
Physical Relativity: Space-Time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective
1. Overview 2. The physics of coordinate transformations 3. The relativity principle and the fable of Albert Keinstein 4. The trailblazers 5. Einstein's principle-theory route to the LorentzExpand
Relativity Theory between Structural and Dynamical Explanations
In this review article I discuss Harvey Brown’s recent book Physical Relativity (OUP, 2005) by presenting and criticizing some of his main arguments in favour of a dynamical underpinning of rodsExpand
Minkowski space-time: A glorious non-entity
It is argued that Minkowski space-time cannot serve as the deep structure within a ``constructive'' version of the special theory of relativity, contrary to widespread opinion in the philosophicalExpand
COI Stories: Explanation and Evidence in the History of Science
This paper takes as its point of departure two striking incongruities between scientific practice and trends in modern history and philosophy of science. (1) Many modern historians of science are soExpand
International Studies in the Philosophy of Science
2003)"Causation as Folk Science," Philosophers' Imprint Vol. 3, No. 4 http://www.philosophersimprint.org/003004/; reprinted as Ch
  • 2007
...
1
2
...