Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience

  title={Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience},
  author={P. Thagard},
  journal={PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association},
  pages={223 - 234}
  • P. Thagard
  • Published 1978
  • Psychology
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
Using astrology as a case study, this paper attempts to establish a criterion for demarcating science from pseudoscience. Numerous reasons for considering astrology to be a pseudoscience are evaluated and rejected; verifiability and falsifiability are briefly discussed. A theory is said to be pseudoscientific if and only if (1) it has been less progressive than alternative theories over a long period of time, and faces many unsolved problems, but (2) the community of practitioners makes little… Expand
Identifying Pseudoscience: A Social Process Criterion
Many philosophers have come to believe there is no single criterion by which one can distinguish between a science and a pseudoscience. But it need not follow that no distinction can be made: aExpand
A Philosopher looks at Astrology
AbstractProfessional astronomers and other scientists have often criticised astrology, although it is not their primary responsibility to tackle borderline subjects. It is rather the task of aExpand
Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation
A definition of pseudoscience is proposed, according to which a statement is pseudoscientific if and only if it (1) pertains to an issue within the domains of science, (2) is not epistemicallyExpand
Astrology and truth: a context in contemporary epistemology
This thesis discusses and gives philosophical context to claims regarding the truth-status of astrology – specifically, horoscopic astrology. These truth-claims, and reasons for them, are sourcedExpand
Demarcating Science from Non-Science
Publisher Summary This chapter discusses the demarcation of science from non-science. If a discipline were unable to offer a characterization of its subject matter, it is suspected that itsExpand
A Secondary Tool for Demarcation Problem: Logical Fallacies
According to Thagard, the behavior of practitioners of a field may also be used for demarcation between science and pseudoscience due to its social dimension in addition to the epistemic one. IExpand
Cicero's demarcation of science: A report of shared criteria.
Demarcation criteria found in Marcus Tullius Cicero's rejection of genethliac astrology and other pseudo-divinatory techniques in his De divinatione (44 BCE) are compared with criteria advocated by a broad selection of modern philosophers of science and other specialists in science studies. Expand
Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?
  • R. Thompson
  • Psychology
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1980
Among the numerous criticisms of sociobiology is the criticism that it is not genuine science. This paper defends sociobiology against this criticism. There are three aspects to the defense. First,Expand
The Multicriterial Approach to the Problem of Demarcation
The problem of demarcating science from nonscience remains unsolved. This article executes an analytical process of elimination of different demarcation proposals put forward since theExpand
Existence problems in philosophy and science
It is argued that the existence of a multiverse is a scientific problem because the evidence is not adequate to justify the claim that the entity exists, and in particular the entity hasn’t been detected. Expand


The Case for Astrology
This defence of astrology is written by a self-confessed believer of astrology. It discusses the history and principles of astrology by refuting the numerous objections against it, surveying theExpand
Astrology in colonial America: an extended query.
An examination of a relatively unexplored and fairly narrowly defined field of human activity could be productive of interesting results if one were to investigate the role of astrology in colonial America. Expand
The True Place of Astrology in the History of Science
HE true place of astrology in the history of science is a vast subject with countless ramifications which it would take a long time to pursue and many pages to relate. My present purpose is toExpand
The two dogmas of empiricism
Modern empiricism has been conditioned in large part by two dogmas. One is a belief in some fundamental cleavage between truths which are analytic, or grounded in meanings independently of matters ofExpand
Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes
For centuries knowledge meant proven knowledge — proven either by the power of the intellect or by the evidence of the senses. Wisdom and intellectual integrity demanded that one must desist fromExpand
Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge: Logic of Discovery or Psychology of Research?
My object in these pages is to juxtapose the view of scientific development outlined in my book, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions , with the better known views of our chairman, Sir KarlExpand
Objections to Astrology
This is a statement by 192 scientists, including 19 Nobel Prize winners, who call the "science" of astrology a deception based on "magic and superstition".
From a Logical Point of View
It is the wish of the author to keep general terms distinct from abstract singular terms, so that the over-all dis­ pensability of some assumption that has always rankled as ad hoc and unintuitive is discovered. Expand
There is a set of teachable procedures that can be described as the logic of science that can increase the efficiency of scientific practice and accelerate the teaching of scientific methods, according to the report. Expand
The Logic of Scientific Discovery.