Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience

@article{Thagard1978WhyAI,
  title={Why Astrology is a Pseudoscience},
  author={P. Thagard},
  journal={PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association},
  year={1978},
  volume={1978},
  pages={223 - 234}
}
  • P. Thagard
  • Published 1978
  • Psychology
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • Using astrology as a case study, this paper attempts to establish a criterion for demarcating science from pseudoscience. Numerous reasons for considering astrology to be a pseudoscience are evaluated and rejected; verifiability and falsifiability are briefly discussed. A theory is said to be pseudoscientific if and only if (1) it has been less progressive than alternative theories over a long period of time, and faces many unsolved problems, but (2) the community of practitioners makes little… CONTINUE READING
    93 Citations
    A Philosopher looks at Astrology
    • 6
    Cutting the Gordian Knot of Demarcation
    • 25
    Demarcating Science from Non-Science
    • 43
    • Highly Influenced
    • PDF
    Cicero's demarcation of science: A report of shared criteria.
    Is Sociobiology a Pseudoscience?
    • R. P. Thompson
    • Psychology
    • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
    • 1980
    • 3
    Existence problems in philosophy and science
    • 2
    • PDF

    References

    SHOWING 1-10 OF 38 REFERENCES
    The Case for Astrology
    • 14
    Astrology in colonial America: an extended query.
    • 7
    The two dogmas of empiricism
    • 3,116
    • PDF
    Objections to Astrology
    • 20
    LOGIC OF DISCOVERY.
    • 45
    The Logic of Scientific Discovery.
    • 5,451
    MAGIC AND MEDICINE
    • 35