Why ‘non-mental’ won’t work: on Hempel’s dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical’

@article{Judisch2008WhyW,
  title={Why ‘non-mental’ won’t work: on Hempel’s dilemma and the characterization of the ‘physical’},
  author={Neal Judisch},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
  year={2008},
  volume={140},
  pages={299-318}
}
  • Neal Judisch
  • Published 1 September 2008
  • Philosophy
  • Philosophical Studies
Recent discussions of physicalism have focused on the question how the physical ought to be characterized. Many have argued that any characterization of the physical should include the stipulation that the physical is non-mental, and others have claimed that a systematic substitution of ‘non-mental’ for ‘physical’ is all that is needed for philosophical purposes. I argue here that both claims are incorrect: substituting ‘non-mental’ for ‘physical’ in the causal argument for physicalism does not… 
Stoljar’s Dilemma and Three Conceptions of the Physical: A Defence of the Via Negativa
AbstractPhysicalism is the thesis that everything is physical. But what does it mean to say that everything is physical? Daniel Stoljar has recently argued that no account of the physical is
HEMPEL’S DILEMMA AND RESEARCH PROGRAMMES: WHY ADDING STANCES IS NOT A BOON
Hempel’s Dilemma is intended to force physicalists to make an unfavourable choice between the current physics and a future physical theory. The problem with the first horn of the dilemma is related
The Zombie Attack, Perry’s Parry, and a Riposte: A Slight Softening of the “Hard Problem” of Consciousness
The “hard problem” of consciousness is a challenge for explanations of the nature of our phenomenal experiences. Chalmers has claimed that physicalist solutions to the challenge are ill-suited due,
Physicalism as a Research Programme
It is argued in this paper that physicalism is best understood as a research programme, rather than a thesis or an attitude, as some philosophers argue. Given that research programmes connect past,
Physicalism, Closure, and the Structure of Causal Arguments for Physicalism: A Naturalistic Formulation of the Physical
Physicalism is the idea that everything either is physical or is nothing over and above the physical. For this formulation of physicalism to have determinate content, it should be identified what the
Self-representationalism and the Russellian ignorance hypothesis: a hybrid response to the problem of consciousness
This thesis aims to provide a compelling and distinctive response to the Problem of Consciousness. This is achieved by offering a bipartite analysis of the epistemic gap at the heart of that problem,
Physicalism as an empirical hypothesis
TLDR
It is argued that van Fraassen’s conclusions run far ahead of what his arguments establish, and that materialists will swallow anything, if the changes accepted are consistent with the truth of materialism when appropriately characterized.
Types of Mechanisms: Ephemeral, Regular, Functional
TLDR
It is shown how the two notions of regularity together are necessary and sufficient for grounding type-level mechanistic explanations and can solve the problem of accidental goal contributions, which afflicts the most promising account of functions as discussed in the next section.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 41 REFERENCES
A defence of the Via Negativa argument for physicalism
Given this premiss, and assuming the implausibility of systematic causal overdetermination, it follows that everything that has a physical effect must itself be physical. However, what does
Two Conceptions of the Physical
The debate over physicalism in philosophy of mind can be seen as concerning an inconsistent tetrad of theses: (1) if physicalism is true, a priori physicalism is true; (2) a priori physicalism is
Physicalism and its Discontents
Contributors Preface Part I. Physicalism: 1. The rise of physicalism David Papineau 2. From physics to physicalism Barry Loewer 3. Sufficiency claims and physicalism: a formulation D. Gene Witmer 4.
There is No Question of Physicalism
Many philosophers are impressed by the progress achieved by physical sciences. This has had an especially deep effect on their ontological views: it has made many of them physicalists. Physicalists
Why Physics Alone Cannot Define the ‘Physical’: Materialism, Metaphysics, and the Formulation of Physicalism
Materialist metaphysicians want to side with physics, but not to take sides within physics. If we took literally the claim of a materialist that his position is simply belief in the claim that all is
The Rediscovery of the Mind
Comments on Goodman's Ways of Worldmaking
1. Nelson Goodman's book and Hilary Putnam's observations on it evoked in me vivid memories of the conception of empirical know ledge that was propounded by Otto Neurath of the Vienna Circle about
From Supervenience to Superdupervenience: Meeting the Demands of a Material World
The term "supervenience" derives etymologically from the Latin "super", meaning on, above, or additional; and from the Latin verb "venire", meaning to come. In non-philosophical contexts the word is
Emergence, Supervenience, and Realization
In the first section of this paper, I articulate Jaegwon Kim's argument against emergent down ward causation. In the second section, I canvas four responses to Kim's argument and argue that each
A ‘physical’ need: physicalism and the via negativa
Benacerraf, P. and H. Putnam. 1964/1983. Introduction. In Philosophy of Mathematics: Selected Readings, ed. P. Benacerraf & H. Putnam, 1-37. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Boghossian, P.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...