Who wins the most when everybody wins? Predicting candidate performance in an authoritarian election

  title={Who wins the most when everybody wins? Predicting candidate performance in an authoritarian election},
  author={{\'A}ngela Fonseca Galvis and Chiara Superti},
  pages={1278 - 1298}
ABSTRACT What explains the variation in vote shares received by candidates in single-party authoritarian elections where everybody wins? The scholarly literature has often ignored institutional variations, treated all authoritarian elections as similar, and explained the variation of vote shares as a consequence of clientelism, coercion or electoral fraud. We employ a unique data set for Cuba’s 2013 National Assembly election to show an alternative answer: even in authoritarian regimes… Expand
The Democratic Claims of Communist Regime Leaders
Communist authoritarian regimes born of revolution claim that their rule is democratic, sponsoring elections that, even if uncompetitive, may supplement their claims to rule if the outcome rewardsExpand
Electoral Responsiveness in Closed Autocracies: Evidence from Petitions in the former German Democratic Republic
Contested elections are usually seen as precondition for constituent responsiveness. By contrast, I show that even uncontested elections can create incentives for autocratic regimes to addressExpand


“Good Types” in Authoritarian Elections
A new electoral design for subnational congress elections in China allows me to investigate the informational utility of authoritarian elections. Authoritarian regimes are notoriously bad at solvingExpand
Authoritarian Regimes and Their Permitted Oppositions: Election Day Outcomes in Cuba
Abstract Electoral opposition to long-established authoritarian regimes may be loyal or rejectionist. Loyal oppositionists vote to send a selective signal to rulers; rejectionist oppositionists voteExpand
Elections under authoritarianism: Preliminary lessons from Jordan
This study examines the politics of elections in authoritarian regimes, focusing on Jordan. Specifically, it considers (1) what is the role of elections in authoritarian regimes? (2) How can weExpand
Incentives to cultivate a personal vote: A rank ordering of electoral formulas☆
Abstract Seat allocation formulas affect candidates' incentives to campaign on a personal rather than party reputation. Variables that enhance personal vote-seeking include: (1) lack of partyExpand
The Single-Party Dictator’s Dilemma Information in Elections Without Opposition
The literature on authoritarian institutions points to nationwide elections as a mechanism for learning about the preferences of citizens. In using elections in this way, however, authoritarians faceExpand
Who Votes in Authoritarian Elections and Why? Determinants of Voter Turnout in Contemporary Egypt
This paper examines voter behavior in Egypt, an electoral authoritarian country. While some voters cast their ballots on an ideological basis, many Egyptian voters expect to receive a direct materialExpand
Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote‐Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation
Proportional representation systems affect the extent to which elected legislators exhibit various attributes that allow them to earn a personal vote. The sources of variation in personalExpand
Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina
  • S. Stokes
  • Political Science
  • American Political Science Review
  • 2005
Political machines (or clientelist parties) mobilize electoral support by trading particularistic benefits to voters in exchange for their votes. But if the secret ballot hides voters' actions fromExpand
Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot
Scholars typically understand vote buying as offering particularistic benefits in exchange for vote choices. This depiction of vote buying presents a puzzle: with the secret ballot, what preventsExpand
Voting and Nonvoting in China: Voting Behavior in Plebiscitary and Limited- Choice Elections
Students of political participation have engaged in intensive study of voting behavior in democratic societies and of nonvoting in communist societies during their totalitarian stage. However, littleExpand