Who owes what to war refugees

  title={Who owes what to war refugees},
  author={Jennifer Kling},
  journal={Journal of Global Ethics},
  pages={327 - 346}
  • J. Kling
  • Published 2016
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Global Ethics
ABSTRACT The suffering of war refugees is often regarded as a wrong-less harm. Although war refugees have been made worse off in severe ways, they have not been wronged (in some cases), because no one intentionally caused their suffering. In military parlance, war refugees are collateral damage. As such, nothing is owed to them as a matter of justice, because their suffering is not the result of intentional wrongdoing; rather, it is the regrettable and unintended result of necessary and… Expand
Problematizing the variable of conflict to address children, media, and conflict
  • Y. Warshel
  • Political Science
  • Journal of Global Ethics
  • 2019
ABSTRACT It is children who are most affected by political conflict. Efforts to establish global peace, equality, justice, and security should, therefore, consider best approaches for aiding andExpand


The Morality of War
HE Treaty of Paris and the President's Naval program have focused the Nation's thought on peace, or, perhaps to be more precise, on the avoidance of war. Yet, because of the diametrically opposedExpand
Terrorism without Intention*
If we are to be engaged in a “war on terrorism,” then we had better get clear about what terrorism is. Until we achieve a clear and coherent understanding of what the morally relevant features ofExpand
Sparing civilians
Seth Lazar has developed a compelling and sophisticated philosophical argument about why it is morally wrong to kill civilians in war. In particular, he defends a principle he calls Moral distinctionExpand
Proportionality and the Psychotic Aggressor: A Vignette in Comparative Criminal Theory *
Western legal systems diverge radically in their approaches to setting limits on the privilege of self-defence. Some systems incline to the view that a person defending his or another life orExpand
Supreme Emergencies Revisited*
Supreme Emergencies are situations in which some group faces a very grave threat, one which conventional means are unable to counter while unconventional means that fall under what I call 'specialExpand
Proportionality in the Morality of War
Just war theory, the most widely accepted theory of the morality of war, contains two proportionality conditions that say a war or an act in war is justified only if the damage it causes is notExpand
The Just War: Force and Political Responsibility
In the wake of Operation Desert Storm, the question of 'just war' has become a hotly contested issue, and this classic text on war and the ethics of modern statecraft written at the height of theExpand
Torture and the Balance of Evils
This article explores the questions raised by the issuance of the Landau Commission Report: What is the legal and moral status of torture of terrorist suspects and others, when that torture isExpand
War and Self-Defense
  • D. Rodin
  • Sociology
  • Ethics & International Affairs
  • 2004
When the Bush and Blair administrations justified the 2003 war on Iraq as an act of preemptive self-defense, this was greeted in many quarters with understandable skepticism. How can the right ofExpand
Aliens and Citizens: The Case for Open Borders
Many poor and oppressed people wish to leave their countries of origin in the third world to come to affluent Western societies. This essay argues that there is little justification for keeping themExpand