Who Settles Disputes? Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes Toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)

@article{Hahm2019WhoSD,
  title={Who Settles Disputes? Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes Toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP)},
  author={H. Hahm and T. K{\"o}nig and Moritz Osnabr{\"u}gge and E. Frech},
  journal={International Organization},
  year={2019},
  volume={73},
  pages={881 - 900}
}
Abstract What type of trade agreement is the public willing to accept? Instead of focusing on individual concerns about market access and trade barriers, we argue that specific treaty design and, in particular, the characteristics of the dispute settlement mechanism, play a critical role in shaping public support for trade agreements. To examine this theoretical expectation, we conduct a conjoint experiment that varies diverse treaty-design elements and estimate preferences over multiple… Expand
8 Citations
Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design
  • 11
International Investment Law and Foreign Direct Reinvestment
  • 11
Institutional reform and public attitudes toward EU decision making
  • PDF
The COVID-19 Pandemic, International Cooperation, and Populism
  • 1
  • PDF

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 77 REFERENCES
Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design
  • 11
Delegating Differences: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bargaining Over Dispute Resolution Provisions
  • 135
  • Highly Influential
Evaluating Three Explanations for the Design of Bilateral Investment Treaties
  • 89
Audience Features and the Strategic Timing of Trade Disputes
  • 55
  • PDF
Bargaining over BITs, Arbitrating Awards: The Regime for Protection and Promotion of International Investment
  • 128
  • Highly Influential
...
1
2
3
4
5
...