Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology

  title={Who Invented the “Copenhagen Interpretation”? A Study in Mythology},
  author={Don A. Howard},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  pages={669 - 682}
  • D. Howard
  • Published 1 December 2004
  • Physics
  • Philosophy of Science
What is commonly known as the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, regarded as representing a unitary Copenhagen point of view, differs significantly from Bohr’s complementarity interpretation, which does not employ wave packet collapse in its account of measurement and does not accord the subjective observer any privileged role in measurement. It is argued that the Copenhagen interpretation is an invention of the mid‐1950s, for which Heisenberg is chiefly responsible, various other… 
Niels Bohr’s Interpretation and the Copenhagen Interpretation—Are the Two Incompatible?
The Copenhagen interpretation, which informs the textbook presentation of quantum mechanics, depends fundamentally on the notion of ontological wave‐particle duality and a viewpoint called
Constructing the Myth of the Copenhagen Interpretation
According to the standard view, the so-called Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics originated in discussions between Bohr and Heisenberg in 1927, and was defended by Bohr in his classic
Popper and Bohr on Realism in Quantum Mechanics
Popper's program in the foundations of quantum mechanics defending objectivity and realism developed out of a profound dissatisfaction with the point of view associated with Bohr, which is usually
Observability, Unobservability and the Copenhagen Interpretation in Dirac's Methodology of Physics
Paul Dirac has been undoubtedly one of the central figures of the last century physics, contributing in several and remarkable ways to the development of quantum mechanics; he was also at the centre
Bohr’s Relational Holism and the Classical-Quantum Interaction
In this paper I present and critically discuss the main strategies that Bohr used and could have used to fend off the charge that his interpretation does not provide a clear-cut distinction between
A ug 2 01 0 The Kantian Framework of Complementarity ∗ †
In the literature on the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics, not enough attention has been directed to the similarities between Bohr’s views on quantum mechanics and Kant’s theoretical
Linguistic Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics; Projection Postulate
As the fundamental theory of quantum information science, recently I proposed the linguistic interpretation of quantum mechanics, which was characterized as the linguistic turn of the Copenhagen


Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Theory
The theoretical and experimental context within which the “Copenhagen Interpretation” of quantum theory was generated is underemphasized by recent critics of the Bohr-Heisenberg philosophy. When an
Book Reviews: Quantum Mechanics. Historical Contingency and the Copenhagen Hegemony.
Why does one theory "succeed" while another, possibly clearer interpretation, fails? By exploring two observationally equivalent, yet conceptually incompatible, views of quantum mechanics, James T.
What Makes a Classical Concept Classical ? Toward a Reconstruction of Niels Bohr ' s Philosophy of Physics
“Every description of natural processes must be based on ideas which have been introduced and defined by the classical theory.” — Niels Bohr, 1923 “There must be quite definite and clear grounds, why
Reconsidering Bohr’s Reply to EPR
Although Bohr’s reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply’s
“Nicht Sein Kann was Nicht Sein Darf,” or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems
The story of Einstein’s misgivings about quantum mechanics and about his debate with Bohr has been told many times—by the participants themselves,1 by their colleagues and contemporaries,2 and by
Quantum Dialogue: The Making of a Revolution
This work seeks to show that science is rooted not just in conversation but in disagreement, doubt and uncertainty. Mara Beller argues that it is precisely this culture of dialogue and controversy
Quantum Mechanics without “The Observer”
This thesis is that the observer, or better, the experimentalist, plays in quantum theory exactly the same role as in classical physics.
In this paper, we shall show how the theory of measurements is to be understood from the point of view of a physical interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of hidden variables developed in a
The EPR Experiment: A Prelude to Bohr's Reply to EPR
Bohr’s (1935) reply to Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen’s (EPR’s) (1935) argument for the incompleteness of quantum theory is notoriously difficult to unravel. It is so diffcult, in fact, that over 60
The Quantum Theory
IN a lecture on the quantum theory it might be thought fitting to commence with a clear explanation of the purpose, nature, and scope of the subject; but an attempt to answer briefly the question,