Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere

@article{Young2012WhereIT,
  title={Where in the brain is morality? Everywhere and maybe nowhere},
  author={Liane Young and James Dungan},
  journal={Social Neuroscience},
  year={2012},
  volume={7},
  pages={1 - 10}
}
The neuroscience of morality has focused on how morality works and where it is in the brain. In tackling these questions, researchers have taken both domain-specific and domain-general approaches—searching for neural substrates and systems dedicated to moral cognition versus characterizing the contributions of domain-general processes. Where in the brain is morality? On one hand, morality is made up of complex cognitive processes, deployed across many domains and housed all over the brain. On… Expand

Topics from this paper

Paper Mentions

How does morality work in the brain? A functional and structural perspective of moral behavior
TLDR
The main brain areas that have been associated with morality at both structural and functional levels are reviewed and how it can be studied is speculated about. Expand
Invoking the brain in studying morality: A theoretical and historical perspective on the neuroscience of morality
Contemporary neuroscientific approaches try to make morality accessible and assessable by linking it to the brain. This wedding between a material entity and an elusive, multifaceted notion has bothExpand
The Moral Brain: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Over the past decade, an explosion of empirical research in a variety of fields has allowed us to understand human moral sensibility as a sophisticated integration of cognitive, emotional, andExpand
Understanding the Adaptive Functions of Morality from a Cognitive Psychological Perspective
What are the possible functions of moral cognition? Addressing this question has proved difficult, leading to disagreement among moral psychologist. Researchers claiming that morality is composed ofExpand
The Neuroscience of Moral Cognition: From Dual Processes to Dynamic Systems
Prominent theories of morality have integrated philosophy with psychology and biology. Although this approach has been highly generative, we argue that it does not fully capture the rich and dynamicExpand
Why (and how) should we study the interplay between emotional arousal, Theory of Mind, and inhibitory control to understand moral cognition?
TLDR
A model of morality is outlined which proposes that the evaluation of basic harmful actions relies on complex interactions between emotional arousal, Theory of Mind (ToM) capacities, and inhibitory control resources. Expand
The Neuroscience of Moral Judgment: Empirical and Philosophical Developments
We chart how neuroscience and philosophy have together advanced our understanding of moral judgment with implications for when it goes well or poorly. The field initially focused on brain areasExpand
Social cognitive neuroScience: a review of core SyStemS
Descartes famously argued that the mind is both everlasting and indivisible (Descartes, 1988). If he was right about the first part, he is probably pretty impressed with the advance of humanExpand
Brain activity during moral judgement of action
Interdisciplinary studies of cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms of moral judgement often combine tools borrowed from philosophy, psychology and neuroscience. In this work, we review theExpand
25 Moral Reasoning: A Network Neuroscience Perspective
Humans are moral creatures – uniquely capable of drawing on beliefs about morality in order to distinguish between actions that are right or wrong. Neuroscience research has investigated the neuralExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 153 REFERENCES
Investigating emotion in moral cognition: a review of evidence from functional neuroimaging and neuropsychology.
TLDR
A narrative review of neuroscientific studies focused on the role of emotion in morality indicates that not only are emotions engaged during moral cognition, but that emotions, particularly those mediated by VMPC, are in fact critical for human morality. Expand
The Neural Correlates of Moral Sensitivity: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Investigation of Basic and Moral Emotions
TLDR
It is suggested that the automatic tagging of ordinary social events with moral values may be an important mechanism for implicit social behaviors in humans. Expand
Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements
TLDR
It is shown that six patients with focal bilateral damage to the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPC), a brain region necessary for the normal generation of emotions, produce an abnormally ‘utilitarian’ pattern of judgements on moral dilemmas that pit compelling considerations of aggregate welfare against highly emotionally aversive behaviours. Expand
Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment
TLDR
The proposed dual-process model of moral judgment suggests another unexamined route by which choice might be influenced: contextual sensitivity of affect. Expand
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
TLDR
Findings in psychology and cognitive neuroscience indicate the importance of affect, although they allow that reasoning can play a restricted but significant role in moral judgment, and point towards a preliminary account of the functional neuroanatomy of moral judgment. Expand
Transgressors, victims, and cry babies: Is basic moral judgment spared in autism?
TLDR
Basic moral judgment is investigated and it appears to be substantially intact in children with autism who are severely impaired in “theory of mind”, and studies of moral reasoning in normal development are extended by way of a new control task, the “cry baby” task. Expand
The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment
TLDR
The present results indicate that brain regions associated with abstract reasoning and cognitive control are recruited to resolve difficult personal moral dilemmas in which utilitarian values require "personal" moral violations, violations that have previously been associated with increased activity in emotion-related brain regions. Expand
Selective deficit in personal moral judgment following damage to ventromedial prefrontal cortex.
TLDR
Compared to normal controls, patients were more willing to judge personal moral violations as acceptable behaviors in personal moral dilemmas, and they did so more quickly, which indicates that the ventromedial prefrontal cortex is necessary to oppose personalmoral violations. Expand
It's the Thought That Counts
TLDR
Investigation of the substrate of the late-developing process in adult brains found three regions responded selectively when subjects read about a protagonist's thoughts, but not when they read about other subjective, internal states or other socially relevant information about a person. Expand
An fMRI Investigation of Spontaneous Mental State Inference for Moral Judgment
  • L. Young, R. Saxe
  • Psychology, Computer Science
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
  • 2009
TLDR
The results illuminate two aspects of theory of mind in moral judgment: (1) spontaneous belief inference and (2) stimulus-driven belief integration. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...