Where Is the Normative Proof? Assumptions and Contradictions in ML Fairness Research
@article{Cooper2020WhereIT, title={Where Is the Normative Proof? Assumptions and Contradictions in ML Fairness Research}, author={Andrew Cooper}, journal={ArXiv}, year={2020}, volume={abs/2010.10407} }
Across machine learning (ML) sub-disciplines researchers make mathematical assumptions to facilitate proof-writing. While such assumptions are necessary for providing mathematical guarantees for how algorithms behave, they also necessarily limit the applicability of these algorithms to different problem settings. This practice is known - in fact, obvious - and accepted in ML research. However, similar attention is not paid to the normative assumptions that ground this work. I argue such… CONTINUE READING
One Citation
Model-sharing Games: Analyzing Federated Learning Under Voluntary Participation
- Computer Science, Mathematics
- ArXiv
- 2020
- PDF
References
SHOWING 1-10 OF 45 REFERENCES
Mathematical Notions vs. Human Perception of Fairness: A Descriptive Approach to Fairness for Machine Learning
- Computer Science
- KDD
- 2019
- 29
- Highly Influential
- PDF
Fair Enough: Improving Fairness in Budget-Constrained Decision Making Using Confidence Thresholds
- Computer Science
- SafeAI@AAAI
- 2020
- 3
- PDF
Is There a Trade-Off Between Fairness and Accuracy? A Perspective Using Mismatched Hypothesis Testing
- Mathematics, Computer Science
- ICML
- 2020
- 6
- Highly Influential
- PDF
Inherent Trade-Offs in the Fair Determination of Risk Scores
- Computer Science, Mathematics
- ITCS
- 2017
- 659
- PDF
An empirical study on the perceived fairness of realistic, imperfect machine learning models
- Computer Science
- FAT*
- 2020
- 7
- PDF