When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?

@article{Wearden2006WhenDA,
  title={When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?},
  author={John H. Wearden and Neil P. McAngus Todd and Luke Jones},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  year={2006},
  volume={59},
  pages={1709 - 1724}
}
Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared… 

Figures, Tables, and Topics from this paper

Judgements of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli
Studies of judgements of the durations of filled auditory and visual stimuli were reviewed, and some previously unpublished data were analysed. Data supported several conclusions. Firstly, auditory
Interference between auditory and visual duration judgements suggests a common code for time
TLDR
Interference was found, in the direction of the durations in the interference blocks, even when the interfering blocks used stimuli in a different modality from the test block, which provides what may be the first direct experimental evidence for a “common code” for durations initially presented in different modalities at some level of the human timing system.
Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations
TLDR
The results indicate that interval timing perception is governed by independent mechanisms for visual and auditory processing, and that there are some interactions between the two processing systems.
Sub-second temporal processing : effects of modality and spatial change on brief visual and auditory time judgments
The present thesis set out to investigate how sensory modality and spatial presentation influence visual and auditory duration judgments in the millisecond range. The effects of modality and spatial
Stimulus spacing effects in duration perception are larger for auditory stimuli: data and a model.
TLDR
Two duration bisection experiments that address interactions between stimulus spacing and stimulus modality are reported, and demonstrate that the qualitative pattern of results can be captured with the single assumption that the durations of visual stimuli are less discriminable from one another than are thedurations of auditory stimuli.
Temporal judgments in multi–sensory space
TLDR
The existence of an error-mechanism, according to which a specific duration is added in order to compensate for the loss of duration perception caused by spatial attention shifts between different locations, is proposed.
TEMPORAL LIMITS OF MEMORY FOR TIME
To further explore how memory influences time judgements, we will address the question of the life span of temporal representations in memory using the “memory-mixing” account of visual/auditory
Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects
TLDR
Findings support the modality-specific account of short-term memory for durations, which shows that the articulatory suppression task decreased recognition performance for auditory durations but not for visual or bimodal ones.
Sensory modality and time perception in children and adults
TLDR
Although timing is more automatic for auditory than visual signals in both children and young adults, children have greater difficulty in keeping the switch in the closed state during the timing of visual signals, consistent with a developmental difference in the operation of the "attentional switch" used to transfer pulses from the pacemaker into the accumulator.
Are memories for duration modality specific?
TLDR
It is suggested that, in humans, visual temporal reference memory may be more permanent than auditory reference memory and that auditory temporal information and visual temporal information do not mutually interfere in reference memory.
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES
Perception of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Children and Adults
TLDR
The 5–year–olds judged visual stimuli as more variable than auditory ones, indicating that their temporal sensitivity was lower in the visual than in the auditory modality, and a theoretical model suggested that this modality effect was due to differences in the pacemaker speed of the internal clock.
Why “Sounds Are Judged Longer than Lights”: Application of a Model of the Internal Clock in Humans
TLDR
Overall, the work showed how a clock model consistent with scalar timing theory, the leading account of animal timing, can address an issue derived from the classical literature on human time perception.
Differential effects of auditory and visual signals on clock speed and temporal memory.
TLDR
The authors posit a model in which auditory and visual signals drive an internal clock at different rates, which is revealed only when the memories for the short and long anchor durations consist of a mix of contributions from accumulations generated by both the fast auditory and slower visual clock rates.
Stimulus Spacing Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans
Two experiments studied the bisection of sets of stimulus durations (ranging from 200 to 800 msec, or 100 to 900 msec) by normal adults. In Experiment 1, two bisection techniques were used: a
Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans.
  • J. Wearden, A. Ferrara
  • Medicine
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology
  • 1996
TLDR
The results of two experiments with human subjects supported a previous conjecture that the L/S ratio used in a bisection task played a critical role in determining the behaviour obtained.
Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps.
  • J. T. Walker, K. Scott
  • Psychology, Medicine
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 1981
TLDR
The finding of auditory dominance in the perception of time runs counter to the results of studies of sensory conflicts in spatial perception, where vision typically dominates audition and touch.
Speeding up an Internal Clock in Children? Effects of Visual Flicker on Subjective Duration
  • S. Droit-Volet, J. Wearden
  • Psychology, Medicine
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology
  • 2002
TLDR
The results were consistent with the idea that the repetitive flicker had increased the speed of the pacemaker of an internal clock in children as young as 3 years and the “pacemaker speed” interpretation of the results was further strengthened by a greater effect of flicker in the 400/1600-ms condition than in the 200/800-MS condition.
Speeding up and (…relatively…) slowing down an internal clock in humans
Two experiments used click-trains to manipulate the subjective duration of stimuli they preceded, in attempts to demonstrate relative slowing down of the pacemaker of a hypothesized internal clock.
Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: 1. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights
TLDR
Six experiments are reported which confirm the robustness of this auditory-visual difference in time judgment and highlight two factors which contribute to its continued presence, movement for vision and intensity for audition.
Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration.
TLDR
Four experiments investigated the effect of trains of clicks on subjective duration in humans, as previous research had suggested that such a manipulation would speed up the pacemaker of an internal clock by increasing participants' arousal.
...
1
2
3
...