When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?

@article{Wearden2006WhenDA,
  title={When do auditory/visual differences in duration judgements occur?},
  author={John H. Wearden and Neil P. McAngus Todd and Luke Jones},
  journal={Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology},
  year={2006},
  volume={59},
  pages={1709 - 1724}
}
Four experiments examined judgements of the duration of auditory and visual stimuli. Two used a bisection method, and two used verbal estimation. Auditory/visual differences were found when durations of auditory and visual stimuli were explicitly compared and when durations from both modalities were mixed in partition bisection. Differences in verbal estimation were also found both when people received a single modality and when they received both. In all cases, the auditory stimuli appeared… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Judgements of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli

The most viable explanation of the effects appears to be some sort of pacemaker-counter model with higher pacemaker speed for auditory stimuli, although this approach cannot, in its present form, deal quantitatively with all the findings usually obtained.

Interference between auditory and visual duration judgements suggests a common code for time

Interference was found, in the direction of the durations in the interference blocks, even when the interfering blocks used stimuli in a different modality from the test block, which provides what may be the first direct experimental evidence for a “common code” for durations initially presented in different modalities at some level of the human timing system.

Opposite Distortions in Interval Timing Perception for Visual and Auditory Stimuli with Temporal Modulations

The results indicate that interval timing perception is governed by independent mechanisms for visual and auditory processing, and that there are some interactions between the two processing systems.

Sub-second temporal processing : effects of modality and spatial change on brief visual and auditory time judgments

The present thesis set out to investigate how sensory modality and spatial presentation influence visual and auditory duration judgments in the millisecond range. The effects of modality and spatial

Temporal judgments in multi–sensory space

TEMPORAL LIMITS OF MEMORY FOR TIME

To further explore how memory influences time judgements, we will address the question of the life span of temporal representations in memory using the “memory-mixing” account of visual/auditory

Short-term memory for auditory and visual durations: evidence for selective interference effects

Findings support the modality-specific account of short-term memory for durations, which shows that the articulatory suppression task decreased recognition performance for auditory durations but not for visual or bimodal ones.

Are memories for duration modality specific?

It is suggested that, in humans, visual temporal reference memory may be more permanent than auditory reference memory and that auditory temporal information and visual temporal information do not mutually interfere in reference memory.

Modality differences in timing and the filled-duration illusion: Testing the pacemaker rate explanation

It was more common for participants to perform best in different modalities in each task, though this was not true for ordinal intra-individual differences in the filled-duration illusion.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 23 REFERENCES

Perception of the Duration of Auditory and Visual Stimuli in Children and Adults

The 5–year–olds judged visual stimuli as more variable than auditory ones, indicating that their temporal sensitivity was lower in the visual than in the auditory modality, and a theoretical model suggested that this modality effect was due to differences in the pacemaker speed of the internal clock.

Why “Sounds Are Judged Longer than Lights”: Application of a Model of the Internal Clock in Humans

Overall, the work showed how a clock model consistent with scalar timing theory, the leading account of animal timing, can address an issue derived from the classical literature on human time perception.

Stimulus Spacing Effects in Temporal Bisection by Humans

Two experiments studied the bisection of sets of stimulus durations (ranging from 200 to 800 msec, or 100 to 900 msec) by normal adults. In Experiment 1, two bisection techniques were used: a

Stimulus range effects in temporal bisection by humans.

  • J. WeardenA. Ferrara
  • Psychology
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology
  • 1996
The results of two experiments with human subjects supported a previous conjecture that the L/S ratio used in a bisection task played a critical role in determining the behaviour obtained.

Auditory-visual conflicts in the perceived duration of lights, tones and gaps.

  • J. T. WalkerK. Scott
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance
  • 1981
The finding of auditory dominance in the perception of time runs counter to the results of studies of sensory conflicts in spatial perception, where vision typically dominates audition and touch.

Speeding up an Internal Clock in Children? Effects of Visual Flicker on Subjective Duration

  • S. Droit-VoletJ. Wearden
  • Psychology
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology
  • 2002
The results were consistent with the idea that the repetitive flicker had increased the speed of the pacemaker of an internal clock in children as young as 3 years and the “pacemaker speed” interpretation of the results was further strengthened by a greater effect of flicker in the 400/1600-ms condition than in the 200/800-MS condition.

Speeding up and (…relatively…) slowing down an internal clock in humans

Studies of Auditory-Visual Differences in Human Time Judgment: 1. Sounds are Judged Longer than Lights

Six experiments are reported which confirm the robustness of this auditory-visual difference in time judgment and highlight two factors which contribute to its continued presence, movement for vision and intensity for audition.

Speeding up an internal clock in humans? Effects of click trains on subjective duration.

Four experiments investigated the effect of trains of clicks on subjective duration in humans, as previous research had suggested that such a manipulation would speed up the pacemaker of an internal clock by increasing participants' arousal.

Human Performance on an Analogue of an Interval Bisection Task

  • J. Wearden
  • Psychology
    The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. B, Comparative and physiological psychology
  • 1991
A theoretical model assuming that humans bisect by taking the difference between a presented duration and the short and long standards, as well as having a bias to respond “long”, fitted the data well and illustrated a way in which the obtained results could be reconciled with scalar timing theory.