When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate

@article{Landsman2005WhenCM,
  title={When champions meet: Rethinking the Bohr-Einstein debate},
  author={Nicolaas P. Landsman},
  journal={Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics},
  year={2005},
  volume={37},
  pages={212-242}
}
  • N. P. Landsman
  • Published 22 July 2005
  • Physics, Philosophy
  • Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Niels Bohr and the Formalism of Quantum Mechanics
It has often been remarked that Bohr's writings on the interpretation of quantum mechanics make scant reference to the mathematical formalism of quantum theory; and it has not infrequently been
Are we living in a quantum world? Bohr and quantum fundamentalism
The spectacular successes of quantum physics have made it a commonplace to assert that we live in a quantum world. This idea seems to imply a kind of “quantum fundamentalism” according to which
Are we living in a quantum world ?
The spectacular successes of quantum physics have made it a commonplace to assert that we live in a quantum world. This idea seems to imply a kind of “quantum fundamentalism” according to which
Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics
Decoherence is like capitalism. Its proponents regard it as obvious, given human nature, and its success seems overwhelming. Competitors largely belong to the past, or get the impression they do.
Feel like Writing a Review for the Mathematical Einstein's Unification
T his book is about the interaction between mathematics and physics in the work and thought of Albert Einstein, with emphasis on his later years. In his early work, culminating in his annus mirabilis
The principle of general tovariance
We tentatively propose two guiding principles for the construction of theories of physics, which should be satisfied by a possible future theory of quantum gravity. These principles are inspired by
Let the Mathematics of Quantum Speak: Allowed and Unallowed Logic
Some notes about quantum physics, an interpretation if one wishes, are put forward, insisting on ‘closely following the mathematics/formalism, the ‘nuts and bolts of what quantum physics says’.
Quantum Mechanics: From Realism to Intuitionism
The interpretation of quantum mechanics has been a problem since its founding days. A large contribution to the discussion of possible interpretations of quantum mechanics is given by the so-called
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 204 REFERENCES
Bohr, Einstein and Realism
Summary The Bohr-Einstein debate on the interpretation of quantum mechanics may be viewed as a discussion on the epistemological status of knowledge gained by physics. It is shown that in fact the
The Description of Nature: Niels Bohr and the Philosophy of Quantum Physics
Niels Bohr, the founding father of modern atomic physics and quantum theory, was as original a philosopher as he was a physicist. This study explores several dimensions of Bohr's vision: the
Niels Bohr’s Times, in Physics, Philosophy, and Polity
1. Ehrenfest71 on adiabatics. Paul Ehrenfest studied physics in his native Vienna, where his contact with Boltzmann (under whose guidance he obtained the Ph.D.) was decisive in directing him to his
Niels Bohr and contemporary philosophy
Preface. Introduction. Bohr's Response to EPR M. Beller, A. Fine. Niels Bohr's Words and the Atlantis of Kantianism C. Chevalley. A Bohmian Response to Bohr's Complementarity J.T. Cushing. Niels Bohr
“Nicht Sein Kann was Nicht Sein Darf,” or the Prehistory of EPR, 1909–1935: Einstein’s Early Worries about the Quantum Mechanics of Composite Systems
The story of Einstein’s misgivings about quantum mechanics and about his debate with Bohr has been told many times—by the participants themselves,1 by their colleagues and contemporaries,2 and by
Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist
Written by the man considered the "Person of the Century" by Time magazine, this is not a glimpse into Einstein's personal life, but an extension and elaboration into his thinking on science. Two of
CAN QUANTUM-MECHANICAL DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL REALITY BE CONSIDERED INCOMPLETE?
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 by his thesis supervisor and mentor Nathan Rosen, together with Albert Einstein and Boris Podolsky.
What Makes a Classical Concept Classical
There was a time, not so very long ago, when Niels Bohr’s influence and stature as a philosopher of physics rivaled his standing as a physicist. But now there are signs of a growing despair — much in
Reconsidering Bohr’s Reply to EPR
Although Bohr’s reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of his philosophy of quantum theory, it is difficult to find a clear statement of the reply’s
...
...