When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize

  title={When Morality Opposes Justice: Conservatives Have Moral Intuitions that Liberals may not Recognize},
  author={Jonathan Haidt and Jesse Graham},
  journal={Social Justice Research},
  • J. Haidt, J. Graham
  • Published 14 April 2007
  • Psychology, Philosophy
  • Social Justice Research
Researchers in moral psychology and social justice have agreed that morality is about matters of harm, rights, and justice. On this definition of morality, conservative opposition to social justice programs appears to be immoral, and has been explained as a product of various non-moral processes such as system justification or social dominance orientation. In this article we argue that, from an anthropological perspective, the moral domain is usually much broader, encompassing many more aspects… 
Discursive or intuitive moral differences? Liberals predict right-wing responses on Haidt’s Moral Foundations Questionnaire
Psychological studies of morality have traditionally focused on harm/care and justice/fairness as the product of developed, epistemic reasoning processes by which people arrive at a consensual code
Another Look at Moral Foundations Theory: Do Authoritarianism and Social Dominance Orientation Explain Liberal-Conservative Differences in “Moral” Intuitions?
Moral foundations theorists propose that the moral domain should include not only “liberal” ethics of justice and care but also ostensibly “conservative” concerns about the virtues of ingroup
Liberals and conservatives rely on common moral foundations when making moral judgments about influential people.
The findings imply that moral foundation theory may have exaggerated differences between liberals and conservatives, as their similarities outweigh their differences.
Why Are Conservatives More Punitive Than Liberals? A Moral Foundations Approach
Results suggest that the association between conservatism and punitiveness is in part spurious because of their grounding in themoral foundations, and studies that do not take the moral foundations into account are at risk of overstating the relationship.
Moral Support: How Moral Values Shape Foreign Policy Attitudes
Although classical international relations theorists largely agreed that public opinion about foreign policy is shaped by moral sentiments, public opinion scholars have yet to explore the content of
The Justice/Morality Link
Few social psychologists who study justice would deny its roots in moral philosophy. Yet, explicit linkages between justice and morality have been relatively rare until recently. This chapter first
Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations.
Across 4 studies using multiple methods, liberals consistently showed greater endorsement and use of the Harm/care and Fairness/reciprocity foundations compared to the other 3 foundations, whereas conservatives endorsed and used the 5 foundations more equally.
Mortal Morality: How Threat and Partisanship Influence Moral Judgment
According to Moral Foundations Theory (MFT), ideologues’ moral judgments fundamentally diverge. Liberals resonate more with individual appeals (to issues of harm or fairness), while conservatives are
A psychological perspective on moral reasoning, processes of decision-making, and moral resistance
ABSTRACT This article presents a psychological approach on the development of social and moral judgments that has relevance for the topics of public justification and world politics. In contrast with
Act versus Impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment
Conservatives and liberals disagree sharply on matters of morality and public policy. We propose a novel account of the psychological basis of these differences. Specifically, we find that


The moral mind : How five sets of innate intuitions guide the development of many culture-specific virtues , and perhaps even modules
1 Introduction Morality is one of the few topics in academe endowed with its own protective spell. A biologist is not blinded by her biological nature to the workings of biology. An economist is not
In Defense of Moral Realism: Reply to Gabennesch
Moral realism is pervasive in everyday life, and the more of it the better. The moral realism of everyday life is not childlike egocentric realism, in Piaget's sense, nor is it, as Gabennesch argues,
Affect, culture, and morality, or is it wrong to eat your dog?
For Brazilian and U.S. adults and children of high and low socioeconomic status, moral judgments were better predicted by affective reactions than by appraisals of harmfulness and suggestions are made for building cross-culturally valid models of moral judgment.
Intuitive ethics: how innately prepared intuitions generate culturally variable virtues
maps embellished with fantastical beasts, sixteenth-century wonder chambers 1⁄2lled with natural and technological marvels, even late-twentieth-century supermarket tabloids–all attest to the human
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition.
The core ideology of conservatism stresses resistance to change and justification of inequality and is motivated by needs that vary situationally and dispositionally to manage uncertainty and threat.
Sexual morality: The cultures and emotions of conservatives and liberals.
Political conservatives and liberals were interviewed about 3 kinds of sexual acts: homosexual sex, unusual forms of masturbation, and consensual incest between an adult brother and sister.
Social Intuitionists Answer Six Questions About Morality
We review the state of the art in moral psychology to answer 6 questions: 1) Where do moral beliefs and motivations come from? 2) How does moral judgment work? 3) What is the evidence for the social
The Emergence of Morality in Young Children
""The Emergence of Morality in Young Children" is one of very few scholarly books concerning the development of moral tendencies in the early years. In its pages, a diverse group of eminent social
Good Natured: The Origins of Right and Wrong in Humans and Other Animals
Prologue Darwinian Dilemmas Survival of the Unfittest Biologicizing Morality Calvinist Sociobiology A Broader View The Invisible Grasping Organ Ethology and Ethics Photo Essay: Closeness Sympathy
Culture wars: American moral divisions across the adult lifespan
Sociologists have argued that the public moral debate in contemporary America is characterized by a “culture war,” pitting “orthodox” and “progressivist” groups against one another (Hunter, 1991).