When High-Powered People Fail

@article{Beilock2005WhenHP,
  title={When High-Powered People Fail},
  author={Sian L. Beilock and Thomas Carr},
  journal={Psychological Science},
  year={2005},
  volume={16},
  pages={101 - 105}
}
We examined the relation between pressure-induced performance decrements, or “choking under pressure,” in mathematical problem solving and individual differences in working memory capacity. In cognitively based academic skills such as math, pressure is thought to harm performance by reducing the working memory capacity available for skill execution. Results demonstrated that only individuals high in working memory capacity were harmed by performance pressure, and, furthermore, these skill… 

Figures from this paper

Choking under pressure and working memory capacity: When performance pressure reduces fluid intelligence

Evidence is offered that choking occurs only in individuals with high WMC, because of their anxiety-ridden perceptions of high-stakes situations, and is not confined to tasks involving acquired skills and knowledge, but encompasses fluid reasoning abilities or intelligence (Gf).

Working memory capacity, controlled attention and aiming performance under pressure

Results support the suggestion that WMC is not only a good predictor of an individual’s ability to control their attention but can also predict those likely to fail under pressure.

The effect of pressure on high- and low-working-memory students: an elaboration of the choking under pressure hypothesis.

Whether high- or low-working-memory elementary-school-aged children were more or less affected by pressure was dependent on task-difficulty and the types of strategies that could be used to solve the problems.

Diagnosing and alleviating the impact of performance pressure on mathematical problem solving

Results demonstrated that performance on problems that rely heavily on verbal WM resources was less accurate under high-pressure than under low-pressure tests and the more people reported worrying during test performance, the worse they performed on the verbally based and spatially based maths problems.

Performance-approach goals deplete working memory and impair cognitive performance.

The present results highlight the distractive consequence of performance-approach goals on cognitive performance, suggesting that cognitive resource allocation is divided among the storage, processing, and retrieval of task-relevant information and the activation of normative goal-attainment concerns.

The Role of Working Memory Capacity in Math Performance

Several studies have noted that those with higher working memory capacity show the most pronounced negative relationship between math anxiety and math performance. The current study was interested in

The benefit of punishment sensitivity on motor performance under pressure.

The results suggest that the benefits of punishment sensitivity are likely underpinned by the effective use of cognitive strategies, and heightened sensitivity to punishment is adaptive for performance under pressure, provided threats are detected early and effective cognitive strategies are implemented.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 24 REFERENCES

The relationships among working memory, math anxiety, and performance.

Overall, the results demonstrated that an individual difference variable, math anxiety, affects on-line performance in math-related tasks and that this effect is a transitory disruption of working memory.

More on the fragility of performance: choking under pressure in mathematical problem solving.

Findings support distraction theories of choking in math, which contrasts with considerable evidence for explicit monitoring theories of choked in sensorimotor skills, and suggests a skill taxonomy based on real-time control structures.

On the fragility of skilled performance: what governs choking under pressure?

Findings support explicit monitoring theories of choking and the popular but infrequently tested belief that attending to proceduralized skills hurts performance.

Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition.

Counter to the common belief that expert performance reflects innate abilities and capacities, recent research in different domains of expertise has shown that expert performance is predominantly

Working-memory capacity, proactive interference, and divided attention: limits on long-term memory retrieval.

  • M. KaneR. Engle
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2000
Results indicate a role for attentional processing, perhaps inhibitory in nature, at encoding and retrieval, and are discussed with respect to theories of WM and prefrontal cortex function.

Emotional modulation of cognitive control: approach-withdrawal states double-dissociate spatial from verbal two-back task performance.

  • J. Gray
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. General
  • 2001
The results suggest that approach-withdrawal states can have selective influences on components of cognitive control, possibly on a hemispheric basis and support and extend several frameworks for conceptualizing emotion-cognition interactions.

Converging evidence that stereotype threat reduces working memory capacity.

Results show that priming self-relevant negative stereotypes reduces women's and Latinos' working memory capacity and mediates the effect of stereotype threat on women's math performance.

Individual differences in working memory and reading

Is working memory capacity task dependent

Models of Working Memory: Mechanisms of Active Maintenance and Executive Control

This paper presents a meta-analyses of working memory from the perspective of the EPIC architecture for modelling skilled perceptual-motor and cognitive human performance and discusses the role of language, attention, and inhibitory mechanisms in this performance.