When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval

@article{Howard2002WhenDS,
  title={When Does Semantic Similarity Help Episodic Retrieval},
  author={Marc W Howard and Michael J. Kahana},
  journal={Journal of Memory and Language},
  year={2002},
  volume={46},
  pages={85-98}
}
Abstract Free recall illustrates the spontaneous organization of memory. This organization comes in two forms, the temporal organization of the list and the semantic relations among list items. Using estimates of semantic similarity provided by latent semantic analysis (LSA; Landauer & Dumais, 1997), we simultaneously assessed the effects of temporal and semantic proximity on output order in delayed and continuous-distractor free recall of random word lists. These analyses revealed that subtle… 

Figures and Tables from this paper

Semantic Structure and Episodic Memory

Department of PsychologyUniversity of PennsylvaniaInvited chapter for LSA: A Road Toward Meaning. In press September 8, 2005AbstractIn remembering a list of words, subjects’ order of recall can

A predictive framework for evaluating models of semantic organization in free recall.

The temporal contiguity effect predicts episodic memory performance.

TLDR
Assessment of the correlation between participants' recall performance and their use of semantic and temporal associations to guide retrieval across nine delayed free recall studies suggests that participants who more effectively form and retrieve associations between items that occur nearby in time perform better on episodic recall tasks.

Task context and organization in free recall

The role of control processes in temporal and semantic contiguity

TLDR
A need for more empirical work exploring how control processes change recall dynamics and for more theoretical work modeling the computational basis of these processes is pointed to.

Semantic cuing and the scale insensitivity of recency and contiguity.

TLDR
Evidence is found of long-term recency and for long-range contiguity in lists composed of items drawn from 3 distinct taxonomic categories and in which items from a given category are temporally separated from one another by items from other categories, all of which are tested for recall.

Compound cuing in free recall.

  • L. LohnasM. Kahana
  • Psychology
    Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition
  • 2014
TLDR
An experiment with immediate, delayed, and continual-distractor free recall conditions showed compound cuing was present in all conditions, and was not significantly influenced by the presence of interitem distractors.

Semantic similarity dissociates short- from long-term recency effects: Testing a neurocomputational model of list memory

TLDR
A new dissociation between short- and long-term recency based on semantic similarity is presented, which is predicted by the model and is due to the mutual support between associated items in the short-term store, which takes place in immediate free recall and delayed free recall but not in continuous-distractor free recall.

Task context and organization 1 Running head: TASK CONTEXT AND ORGANIZATION Task context and organization in free recall

Prior work on organization in free recall has focused on the ways in which semantic and temporal information determine the order in which material is retrieved from memory. Tulving’s theory of

Richer concepts are better remembered: number of features effects in free recall

TLDR
The expectation that encoding variability could be driven by the properties of the to-be-remembered item was tested, providing evidence that stimulus-specific differences in processing at encoding have consequences for explicit memory retrieval.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 68 REFERENCES

Associative retrieval processes in free recall

TLDR
A new method for analyzing associative processes in free recall is presented, which illustrates the importance of association by contiguity by examining conditional response probabilities in the output sequence.

Contextual variability and serial position effects in free recall.

TLDR
Both the end of list Recency effect and the lag recency effect, across all distractor conditions, can be explained by a single-store model in which context, retrieved with each recalled item, serves as a cue for subsequent recalls.

Distance between related words in free recall: Trace of the STS

Availability versus accessibility of information in memory for words

Search of associative memory.

Describes search of associative memory (SAM), a general theory of retrieval from long-term memory that combines features of associative network models and random search models. It posits

Contextual and distinctive processes and the serial position function.

Abstract When people recall a series of items, memory for the last few items is enhanced relative to items earlier in the list, a result called the recency effect. When the final item in the list is

Adult age differences in the temporal characteristics of category free recall.

TLDR
Results are interpreted in terms of combined effects of an age-compromised episodic memory system (between-category IRTs) accompanied by a comparatively preserved semantic system (within- category I RTs) in healthy aging.

Temporal properties of category recall

A model for interference and forgetting

A new model for interference and forgetting is presented. The model is based on the Raaijmakers and Shiffrin search of associative memory (SAM) theory for retrieval from long-term memory. It includes

Storage Mechanisms in Recall

...