What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice

@article{VaneWright1991WhatTP,
  title={What to protect?—Systematics and the agony of choice},
  author={Richard I. Vane-Wright and Christopher J. Humphries and Paul H. Williams},
  journal={Biological Conservation},
  year={1991},
  volume={55},
  pages={235-254}
}

Figures and Tables from this paper

Conservation: Evaluation of priorities for species and habitats

This chapter documents the considerations that help guide decisions over priorities, and is also pertinent to the Convention on Biological Diversity process which requires signatories to identify priority species and habitats.

Can species data only be appropriately used to conserve biodiversity?

This work proposes a top-down model dealing with broad organisational levels first, and finer-scale species distributions last, and argues for its use at a stage when, in its opinion, it adds most to the value of the prioritisation exercise.

The Species Problem and Conservation: What are We Protecting?

: Although conservation biologists base most of their activities on species taxa, they have participated little in the debate of systematists and evolutionary biologists about the recognition and

Conserving biodiversity: a structural challenge

By stimulating work on inventorying and mapping the diversity of tropical Asian insects, the TAIIV programme can contribute much to establishing the fundamental empirical basis on which effective biodiversity conservation planning and monitoring ultimately depend.

A Molecular Perspective on the Conservation of Diversity

This paper illustrates the application of comparative phylogeography to conservation assessments through two case studies; rainforest fauna in the wet tropics of Australia, and forest-dwelling herpetofauna in South-east Queensland, where mtDNA diversity is strongly partitioned among populations in a manner broadly consistent with environmental modelling.

Assessment for conservation and protection

It is not realistic to spread all resources thinly in an attempt to protect and conserve all known endangered species. How do you choose between one species and another? Where there is much variation

Quest for adequate biodiversity surrogates in a time of urgency

  • F. Forest
  • Environmental Science
    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2017
Surrogates are expected to save time and resources compared with more conventional methods and have attracted increasing interest among conservation planners, which can either mirror the distribution patterns of other features that are less readily accessible, but potentially more informative or relevant in a particular context, or more easily represent biodiversity as a whole.

What is mahogany? The importance of a taxonomic framework for conservation

It is shown that while there is substantial genetic variation in the genome as a whole, variation inThe chloroplast genome is low and this is the first reported analysis of cpDNA in the genus Swietenia.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 34 REFERENCES

The Measurement of Species Diversity

The present contribution attempts to define in a precise, but still generalized, what is or should be meant by the many terms sur­ rounding the concept-cluster diversity.

Introduction to some Australian developments in conservation evaluation

Selecting networks of reserves to maximise biological diversity

Neglected taxonomy and continuing extinctions of tuatara (Sphenodon)

The pattern of genetic and morphological differentiation reported here supports a taxonomy dating from 1877 that identified two extant species, one subsequently separated into two subspecies, and warrants increased conserving attention for the single populations of S. guntheri and S. reischeki.

Quantitative Ethnobotany and the Case for Conservation in Ammonia

: Quantitative data are presented on the use of trees in terra firme dense forest by four indigenous Amazonian groups: the Ka'apor and Tembe, both Tupi-Guarani-speaking groups of Brazil; the Panare,

Research Priorities in Tropical Biology

Some persons have asked 'Why Biosphere? Why not environment?' The answer to this cogent question is that environment is not a unitary whole: it encompasses only part of a system. In excluding us, as

Managing for biodiversity.

A discussion is presented of efficient strategies for species preservation in spite of continued human alteration of the environment and incentives to maintain seminatural areas as a conservation strategy are recommended.