• Corpus ID: 29874795

What size were Arctodus simus and Ursus spelaeus (Carnivora: Ursidae)?

@article{Christiansen1999WhatSW,
  title={What size were Arctodus simus and Ursus spelaeus (Carnivora: Ursidae)?},
  author={Per Christiansen},
  journal={Annales Zoologici Fennici},
  year={1999},
  volume={36},
  pages={93-102}
}
  • P. Christiansen
  • Published 1999
  • Environmental Science, Geography, Biology
  • Annales Zoologici Fennici
Body masses of the giant short-faced bear (Arctodus simus Cope) and the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus Rosenmuller & Heinroth) were calculated with equations based on a long-bone dimensions:body mass proportion ratio in extant carnivores. [] Key Result Despite its more long-limbed, gracile and felid-like anatomy as compared with large extant ursids, large Arctodus specimens considerably exceeded even the largest extant ursids in mass.

Figures and Tables from this paper

Giant Short-faced Bears (Arctodus simus) in Pleistocene Florida USA, a Substantial Range Extension

Abstract Fossils of the giant short-faced bear, Arctodus simus (Cope, 1879), have been recovered from over 100 localities in North America, extending from Mexico to Alaska and California to Virginia.

ite force of the extinct Pleistocene Cave bear Ursus spelaeus osenmüller from Europe orce de la morsure de l’ours des cavernes Ursus spelaeus Rosenmüller u Pléistocène d’Europe

In this paper, I have made a theoretical calculation of the Cave bear’s bite force (BF) following the “dry skull method” and I present for the first time BF data that can be of interest to elucidate

Palaeohistology and life history evolution in cave bears, Ursus spelaeus sensu lato

TLDR
The histological study of 62 femora from 23 different European localities and comparisons with specimens of five extant ursid species revealed novel data on tissue types and growth patterns of cave bears.

Demythologizing Arctodus simus, the ‘Short-Faced’ Long-Legged and Predaceous Bear that Never Was

TLDR
The results do not support the previous views of A. simus as a fast-running super-predator or as a specialized scavenger, and the picture that emerges from this study is one of a colossal omnivorous bear whose diet probably varied according to resource availability.

Body size in proboscideans, with notes on elephant metabolism

TLDR
Both the basal and the field metabolic rates of extant elephants are lower than predicted for a hypothetical mammal, in accordance with their body size and subsistence on low-quality foods.

Body mass estimation in xenarthra: A predictive equation suitable for all quadrupedal terrestrial placentals?

TLDR
Surprisingly, although obtained from ungulates and xenarthrans, these five selected equations were also able to predict the body mass of species from groups as different as rodents, carnivores, hyracoideans, or tubulidentates, suggesting the presence of a complex common allometric pattern for all quadrupedal placentals.

The Largest Known Bear, Arctotherium angustidens, from the Early Pleistocene Pampean Region of Argentina: With a Discussion of Size and Diet Trends in Bears

TLDR
It is suggested that the larger size and more carnivorous nature of A. angustidens, compared to later members of the genus, may reflect the relative lack of other large carnivores and abundance of herbivores in South America just after the Great American Biotic Interchange.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 30 REFERENCES

Body mass in large extant and extinct carnivores

TLDR
Two of the extinct carnivores (Smilodon fatalis and Panthera atrox) are estimated to be as much as one and a half times heavier than previously thought.

A Giant Short-faced Bear (Arctodus simus) from the Pleistocene of Northern Utah

A large arctodont bear is reported from Pleistocene shoreline deposits of Lake Bonneville in Salt Lake County, Utah. Although these bones are 6-47 percent larger than other known arctodont bones, the

Differential scaling of the long bones in the terrestrial carnivora and other mammals

TLDR
The capacity to compensate for size increases through alteration of limb posture is limited in extremely large‐sized mammals, such that radical changes in bone shape are required to maintain similar levels of peak bone stress.

Limb bone proportions and body mass of the cave bear (Ursus spelaeus)

TLDR
The European cave bear evolved during the Middle Pleistocene and adapted to mountain environments, and consequently the shaft widths give higher weight estimates to the cave bear than the other dimensions.

Walker's mammals of the world

From aardwolves and bandicoots to yapoks and zorillas, Ernest P. Walker's Mammals of the World is the most comprehensive-the pre-eminent-reference work on mammals. Now, completely revised and

The age of mammals

TLDR
Today, the earth is host to about 5,500 species of mammals, and their forms range from burrowers to fast land runners to huge elephants to flying bats to a spectrum of marine creatures including whales, manatees, seals, and sea lions.

Scaling of mammalian long bones: small and large mammals compared

Long bones from a taxonomically diverse assemblage of extant terrestrial mammals, spanning more than three orders of magnitude in body mass, have been measured in order to evaluate earlier models

Scaling of the limb long bones to body mass in terrestrial mammals

TLDR
Differences in limb posture and locomotor performance have profound influence on the amount of stress set up in the appendicular bones during rigorous physical activity and make it unlikely that scaling of long bones across a large size range of terrestrial mammals can be satisfactorily explained by any one power function.

Allometry of quadrupedal locomotion: the scaling of duty factor, bone curvature and limb orientation to body size.

  • A. Biewener
  • Biology
    The Journal of experimental biology
  • 1983
TLDR
Preliminary data provide preliminary data which appear to explain, along with the decrease in bone curvature and angle, the similar magnitudes of peak bone stress developed during locomotion in different sized animals.

Size and Shape in Biology

TLDR
The model proposed here promises useful answers in comparisons of living things on both the microscopic and the gross scale, as part of the growing science of form, which asks precisely how organisms are diverse and yet again how they are alike.