What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration

@article{Holbrook2012WhatII,
  title={What is interdisciplinary communication? Reflections on the very idea of disciplinary integration},
  author={James Britt Holbrook},
  journal={Synthese},
  year={2012},
  volume={190},
  pages={1865-1879}
}
  • J. B. Holbrook
  • Published 1 July 2013
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • Synthese
In this paper I attempt to answer the question: What is interdisciplinary communication? I attempt to answer this question, rather than what some might consider the ontologically prior question—what is interdisciplinarity (ID)?—for two reasons: (1) there is no generally agreed-upon definition of ID; and (2) one’s views regarding interdisciplinary communication have a normative relationship with one’s other views of ID, including one’s views of its very essence. I support these claims with… 

Topics from this paper

Authors’ Response: A Perspectivist View on the Perspectivist View of Interdisciplinary Science
Introduction « 1 » The commentaries on our target article are very diverse in their standpoint and focus. This diversity illustrates a main point in the article: perspectives determine what observers
Epistemological or Political? Unpacking Ambiguities in the Field of Interdisciplinarity Studies
This paper unpacks ambiguities in the field of interdisciplinarity studies (IDS), explores where they come from and how they inhibit consolidation of the field. The paper takes its point of departure
International workshop “ How to evaluate interdisciplinary research ? Conceptual , methodological and empirical challenges
In recent years issues pertaining to evaluation and quality control has become a topic of concern in the context of interdisciplinary research. No doubt as a consequence of the latter being an
Interdisciplinary success without integration
Some scholars see interdisciplinarity as a special case of a broader unificationist program. They accept the unification of the sciences as a regulative ideal, and derive from this the normative
What makes interdisciplinarity difficult? Some consequences of domain specificity in interdisciplinary practice
TLDR
This paper draws upon two cases of interdisciplinary collaboration; those between ecologists and economists, and those between molecular biologists and systems biologists, to illustrate some of the cognitive barriers which have contributed to failures and difficulties of interactions between these fields.
Distributed Cognition in Aid of Interdisciplinary Collaborations
What does it take to perform collaborative interdisciplinarity with good epistemic and academic results? This pragmatical question, slightly rephrased, has been one of the few key issues of the
Situative Interdisciplinarity: Empirical Reflections on Ten Years of Cross-Disciplinary Research
Abstract Given the current call for interdisciplinarity, we reflect on pragmatic methodological implementations of collaborative research – by drawing on empirical evidence from two large-scale
On the nature of cross-disciplinary integration: A philosophical framework.
TLDR
This paper reviews prominent accounts of cross-disciplinary integration from two literatures that are rarely brought together, and develops a framework that integrates their insights-integration as a generic combination process the details of which are determined by the specific contexts in which particular integrations occur.
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research – shifting philosophical paradigms of science
TLDR
This article aims at an epistemology for interdisciplinary research (IDR), in particular, IDR for solving ‘real-world’ problems, and focuses on the question why researchers experience cognitive and epistemic difficulties in conducting IDR.
Sustainability and Collaboration: Crossdisciplinary and Cross-Sector Horizons
The title of this article signals increasing collaboration across boundaries aimed at understanding and solving complex scientific and societal problems. The article is a reflective analysis of five
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
The rationalization of meaning and understanding: Davidson and Habermas
To the doctrinal schisms that always divided philosophers, the twen tieth century added a cultural rift that bifurcated the philosophical world into mutually indifferent factions. Alongside the
Trust, expertise, and the philosophy of science
TLDR
It is argued that philosophers of science should extend their efforts to develop normative conceptions of trust that can serve to facilitate trust between scientific experts and ordinary citizens to understand better how ‘postnormal’ science interactions are possible using trust.
Socially relevant philosophy of science: an introduction
TLDR
This paper illustrates various ways in which SRPOS can provide social benefits, as well as benefits to scientific practice and philosophy itself, and calls for an expansion of philosophy of science to include more of this type of work.
On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme
Philosophers of many persuasions are prone to talk of conceptual schemes. Conceptual schemes, we are told, are ways of organizing experience; they are systems of categories that give form to the data
The experience of the tacit in multi- and interdisciplinary collaboration
In exploring his concept of interactional expertise in the context of managers of big science projects, Collins identifies the development and deployment tacit knowledge as central, but acknowledges
The Oxford Handbook of Interdisciplinarity
A short history of knowledge formations / Peter Weingart -- A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity / Julie Thompson Klein -- Interdisciplinary cases and disciplinary knowledge / Wolfgang Krohn -- Box:
Interdisciplinary Research: Process and Theory
TLDR
Analysis of Insights and Producing an Interdisciplinary Understanding: Interdisciplinarity for the New Century and the Origins of Interdisciplinary Studies.
Interdisciplinary Collaboration : An Emerging Cognitive Science
Contents: Preface. S.J. Derry, C.D. Schunn, Introduction to the Study of Interdisciplinarity: A Beautiful But Dangerous Beast. Part I: Theories and Frameworks. D.T. Campbell, Ethnocentrism of
Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise: Creating New Kinds of Collaboration
Cross-disciplinary collaboration increasingly characterizes today's science and engineering research. The problems and opportunities facing society do not come neatly sorted by discipline.
On the Pragmatics of Communication
edited by Maeve Cooke Jurgen Habermas's program in formal pragmatics fulfills two main functions. First, it serves as the theoretical underpinning for his theory of communicative action, a crucial
...
1
2
3
4
5
...