What is a "Good" Encoding of Guarded Choice?

@article{Nestmann2000WhatIA,
  title={What is a "Good" Encoding of Guarded Choice?},
  author={Uwe Nestmann},
  journal={Inf. Comput.},
  year={2000},
  volume={156},
  pages={287-319}
}
The π-calculus with synchronous output and mixed-guarded choices is strictly more expressive than the π-calculus with asynchronous output and no choice. This result was recently proved by Palamidessi and, as a corollary, she showed that there is no fully compositional encoding from the former into the latter that preserves divergencefreedom and symmetries. This paper argues that there are nevertheless ‘good’ encodings between these calculi. In detail, we present a series of encodings for… CONTINUE READING
Highly Cited
This paper has 108 citations. REVIEW CITATIONS

From This Paper

Topics from this paper.
66 Citations
39 References
Similar Papers

Citations

Publications citing this paper.

109 Citations

051015'98'02'07'12'17
Citations per Year
Semantic Scholar estimates that this publication has 109 citations based on the available data.

See our FAQ for additional information.

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…