What is Speciesism?

  title={What is Speciesism?},
  author={Oscar Horta},
  journal={Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics},
  • Oscar Horta
  • Published 1 June 2010
  • Philosophy
  • Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
In spite of the considerable literature nowadays existing on the issue of the moral exclusion of nonhuman animals, there is still work to be done concerning the characterization of the conceptual framework with which this question can be appraised. This paper intends to tackle this task. It starts by defining speciesism as the unjustified disadvantageous consideration or treatment of those who are not classified as belonging to a certain species. It then clarifies some common misunderstandings… 
Is Speciesism Wrong by Definition?
  • F. Jaquet
  • Philosophy
    Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics
  • 2019
Oscar Horta has argued that speciesism is wrong by definition. In his view, there can be no more substantive debate about the justification of speciesism than there can be about the legality of
Speciesism and Speciescentrism
The term ‘speciesism’ was once coined to name discrimination against nonhuman animals (Ryder 1975) as well as the bias that such discrimination expresses (Singer 2009 [1975]). It has sparked a debate
The Speciesism Debate: Intuition, Method, and Empirical Advances
  • Jeroen Hopster
  • Philosophy
    Animals : an open access journal from MDPI
  • 2019
The need for integrating philosophical and empirical research is underscored, to come to terms with the extent to which the interests of members of different species are alike, and with the question of whether any dissimilarities might be morally relevant.
The Missing Link: Scientific Sexism, Racism and Speciesism
In this paper I am undertaking a multidisciplinary investigation of causes, conditions and connections of discriminatory practices in the domain of science which are based on sexist, racist and
Anthropocentrism and speciesism: conceptual and normative issues
Anthropocentrism is the position according to which the interests of human beings should be favoured over the interests of nonhuman entities. Anthropocentrism is usually associated with speciesism, a
Egalitarianism and Animals
The moral consideration of nonhuman animals and the critique of speciesism have been defended by appeal to a variety of ethical theories. One of the main approaches in moral and political philosophy
Speciesism and tribalism: embarrassing origins
Animal ethicists have been debating the morality of speciesism for over forty years. Despite rather persuasive arguments against this form of discrimination, many philosophers continue to assign
Moral Considerability and the Argument from Relevance
The argument from relevance expresses an intuition that, although shared by many applied ethicists, has not been analyzed and systematized in the form of a clear argument thus far. This paper does
The Moral Standing of Animals: Towards a Psychology of Speciesism
Five studies show that people morally value individuals of certain species less than others even when beliefs about intelligence and sentience are accounted for, and suggest that similar mechanisms might underlie both speciesism and other well-researched forms of prejudice.
Expanding Global Justice: The Case for the International Protection of Animals
This article examines and rejects the view that nonhuman animals cannot be recipients of justice, and argues that the main reasons in favor of universal human rights and global justice also apply in


The Argument from Species Overlap
The ‘argument from species overlap’ (abbreviated ASO) claims that some human and nonhuman animals possess similar sets of morally relevant characteristics, and are therefore similarly morally
Deep Ethology, Animal Rights, and the Great Ape/Animal Project: Resisting Speciesism and Expanding the Community of Equals
In this essay I argue that the evolutionary and comparative study of nonhuman animal (hereafter animal) cognition in a wide range of taxa by cognitive ethologists can readily inform discussions about
Doing Right by Our Animal Companions
The philosophical literature on the moral status of nonhuman animals, which is bounteous, diverse, and sophisticated, contains a glaring omission. There is little discussion of human responsibilities
Do Animals Feel Pain
In an oft-quoted passage from The Principles of Morals and Legislation (1789), Jeremy Bentham addresses the issue of our treatment of animals with the following words: ‘the question is not, Can they
Theodicy and Animal Pain
The existence of evil is compatible with the existence of God, most theists would claim, because evil either results from the activities of free agents, or it contributes in some way toward their
Moral Status: Obligations to Persons and Other Living Things
knowledged these facts, our reason should tell us that if we would not like to be made to suffer, neither will they. This is a version of the golden rule. The undeniable existence of this wider
On a Case for Animal Rights
Down through the past decade and more, no philosophical writer has taken a greater interest in the issues of how we ought to act in relation to animals, nor pressed more strongly the case for
Beyond Prejudice: The Moral Significance of Human and Nonhuman Animals
In Beyond Prejudice , Evelyn B. Pluhar defends the view that any sentient conative being—one capable of caring about what happens to him or herself—is morally significant, a view that supports the
The specter of speciesism : Buddhist and Christian views of animals
This new study looks at how non-human animals have been viewed in the Buddhist and Christian religious traditions. The concept of speciesism, coined in 1970 as an analogy to racism and discussed
Justice and the Politics of Difference
This book challenges the prevailing philosophical reduction of social justice to distributive justice. It critically analyzes basic concepts underlying most theories of justice, including