What do animal signals mean?

  title={What do animal signals mean?},
  author={Drew Rendall and Michael J. Owren and Michael J. Ryan},
  journal={Animal Behaviour},

Figures and Tables from this paper

Animal communication.
  • G. Kaplan
  • Psychology
    Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
  • 2014
The contention is that animal communication may reveal significant thought processes that enable some individuals in a small number of species so far investigated to anticipate what conspecifics might do, although some researchers think of such behavior as adaptive or worth dismissing as anthropomorphizing.
What do animal signals do?
Animal communication: insights from linguistic pragmatics
The Content of Animal Signals
This chapter surveys current views about the content of animal signals in terms of necessary and sufficient conditions and presuppose that certain behaviors mean/indicate something in the first place.
Functionally referential signals: A promising paradigm whose time has passed
It is argued that the concept of functional reference has outlived its usefulness and become a red herring in the pursuit of the links between primate communication and human language.
The Evolution of Primate Communication
Against the prior view that primate communication is based only on signal decoding, comparative evidence suggests that primates are able, no less than humans, to intentionally perform or understand
Functionally Referential Communication in Mammals: The Past, Present and the Future
The functionally referential framework is still informative when interpreting the meaning of animal vocalizations but, based on emerging research, requires further integration with other approaches investigating animal vocal complexity to broaden its applicability.
Nonhuman Primate Communication, Pragmatics, and the Origins of Language
Comparisons with the cognition and communication of other species have long informed discussions of the origins and evolution of human communication and language. This research has often focused on


Function and Intention in the Calls of Non-Human Primates
The mental mechanisms underlying the vocalizations of non-human primates appear to be fundamentally different from those that underlie human speech, because monkeys do not apparently call to one another with the intent of modifying or influencing each other's mental states.
Essay on Contemporary Issues in Ethology: Variation among Mammalian Alarm Call Systems and the Problem of Meaning in Animal Signals
Comparisons of the physical, behavioral and habitat characteristics of primates and ground-dwelling sciurid rodents suggest that incompatibility of the escape responses required to avoid different classes of predators may have been an important factor in the evolution of functionally referential alarm calls.
Referential labelling in Diana monkeys
Analysis of male and female alarm-call behaviour showed that Diana monkeys consistently responded to predator category regardless of immediate threat or direction of attack, and suggested that, in addition to predator categories, monkeys' alarm calls might also convey information about the predator's distance.
Animal Signals by John Maynard Smith and David Harper argues convincingly that although sufficient, the handicap principle is hardly necessary to explain reliable signals because not all signals are costly, and not all costs are handicaps.
Economic models of animal communication
This model supports one prediction of sensory drive models: that latent preferences may selectively favour some signal precursors over others and imposes a serious constraint on sensory drive by requiring that there be sufficient benefits to a receiver to compensate for the costs of disrupting the optimal receiver strategy used before exploitation.
The Handicap Principle: A Missing Piece of Darwin's Puzzle
The authors convincingly demonstrate that when an animal acts altruistically, it handicaps itself-assumes a risk or endures a sacrifice-not primarily to benefit its kin or social group but to increase its own prestige within the group and thus signal its status as a partner or rival.
Receiver psychology and the evolution of animal signals
Constraints and preadaptations in the earliest stages of language evolution
It is suggested that, in the earliest stages of language evolution, communication had a formal structure that grew out of its speakers’ knowledge of social relations that is referential, discretely coded, hierarchically structured, rule-governed, and propositional.