What do I make of your Latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling.

  title={What do I make of your Latinorum? Sensitivity auditing of mathematical modelling.},
  author={A. Saltelli and {\^A}. Pereira and J. Sluijs and S. Funtowicz},
  journal={International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy},
  • A. Saltelli, Â. Pereira, +1 author S. Funtowicz
  • Published 2012
  • Physics, Computer Science, Mathematics
  • International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy
  • Sensitivity analysis, mandated by existing guidelines as a good practice to use in conjunction to mathematical modelling, is as such insufficient to ensure quality in the treatment of uncertainty of science for policy. If one accepts that policy-related science calls for an extension of the traditional internal, peer review-based methods of quality assurance to higher levels of supervision, where extended participation and explicit value judgments are necessary, then by the same token… CONTINUE READING
    Why so many published sensitivity analyses are false: A systematic review of sensitivity analysis practices
    • 63
    • PDF
    Footprints to nowhere
    • 61
    • PDF
    The fallacy of evidence based policy
    • 11
    • PDF
    Does modelling need a Reformation? Ideas for a new grammar of modelling
    • 1
    Do PISA data justify PISA-based education policy?
    • 14
    • PDF


    Publications referenced by this paper.
    How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis
    • 659
    • PDF
    Science for the post-normal age
    • 2,391
    Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators
    • 511
    • PDF
    Probabilistic sensitivity analysis of complex models: a Bayesian approach
    • 882
    • PDF
    Global Sensitivity Analysis
    • 758
    Risk, Uncertainty and Profit
    • 11,659
    The "Stern Review" on the Economics of Climate Change
    • 2,241
    • PDF
    Sensitivity Analysis as an Ingredient of Modeling
    • 592
    • PDF