What are randomised controlled trials good for?

  title={What are randomised controlled trials good for?},
  author={Nancy Cartwright},
  journal={Philosophical Studies},
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are widely taken as the gold standard for establishing causal conclusions. Ideally conducted they ensure that the treatment ‘causes’ the outcome—in the experiment. But where else? This is the venerable question of external validity. I point out that the question comes in two importantly different forms: Is the specific causal conclusion warranted by the experiment true in a target situation? What will be the result of implementing the treatment there? This… Expand
What’s in a gold standard? In defence of randomised controlled trials
  • M. Backmann
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • Medicine, health care, and philosophy
  • 2017
It is argued that at least in the case of medical research, the authors know enough about the relevant causal mechanisms to be justified to ignore a number of factors and that the stance of evidence-based medicine that RCTs are the best available method to assess a treatment’s efficacy is defended. Expand
What does randomisation achieve?
A response to Worrall and others who challenge the epistemological value of RCTs, which argues that randomisation offers no advantage over balanced systematic designs in which experimental and control groups are carefully matched according to known confounders. Expand
Randomised trials for policy: a review of the external validity of treatment effects
The paper provides a first survey of the literature on external validity. The starting point for this are debates regarding the use of randomised evaluations to inform policy. Besides synthesisingExpand
What role should Randomised Control Trials play in providing the 1 evidence base underpinning conservation ?
15 There is general agreement that conservation decision-making should be evidence-informed, but many 16 evaluations of intervention effectiveness do not attempt to account for confounding variablesExpand
Policy Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials, and External Validity – A Systematic Review
A theoretical framework of external validity is presented and the potential hazards that compromise generalizing results beyond the studied population, namely Hawthorne effects, general equilibrium effects, specific sample problems, and special care in the provision of the randomized treatment are identified. Expand
Generalization in the Tropics: Development policy, randomized controlled trials, and external validity
It is found that the majority of published RCTs does not discuss these hazards and many do not provide the necessary information to assess potential problems, and calls for including external validity dimensions in a more systematic reporting on the results of R CTs. Expand
What role should randomized control trials play in providing the evidence base for conservation?
It is argued that conservation should aim to avoid a rerun of the polarized debate surrounding the use of RCTs in other fields, and that Randomized control trials can be useful and could become a more widely used tool for the evaluation of conservation impact. Expand
The Confounding Question of Confounding Causes in Randomized Trials
  • J. Fuller
  • Psychology, Medicine
  • The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 2019
A thought experiment is run, the CONFOUND study, and a new account of causal inference in ideal and real comparative group studies is suggested that helps clarify the roles of confounding variables and randomization. Expand
Causal Interaction and External Validity: Obstacles to the Policy Relevance of Randomized Evaluations
An analogy with matching estimators illustrates the current inconsistency in approaches to estimating causal relationships and generalizing these estimates to other populations and contexts. Expand
Philosophers on drugs
  • B. Holman
  • Sociology, Computer Science
  • Synthese
  • 2017
It is argued that for the assessment of actual evidence, produced in a world that is far from ideal, omission of the social aspects of medical epistemology leads philosophers to draw the wrong lessons from cases they take as paradigmatic cases for their views. Expand


Better reporting of randomised controlled trials: the CONSORT statement
It is entirely reasonable to require higher standards for papers reporting randomised trials than those describing other types of study, since randomised controlled trials are the best way to compare the effectiveness of different interventions. Expand
What is this thing called efficacy
This paper is about efficacy, effectiveness, the need for theory to join the two, and the tragedies of exporting the Cochrane medical-inspired ideology to social policy. Loosely, efficacy is what isExpand
Evidence-based policy: what’s to be done about relevance?
How can philosophy of science be of more practical use? One thing we can do is provide practicable advice about how to determine when one empirical claim is relevant to the truth of another; i.e.,Expand
Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies.
A discussion of matching, randomization, random sampling, and other methods of controlling extraneous variation is presented. The objective is to specify the benefits of randomization in estimatingExpand
[The evidence (in) the evidence-based medicine].
  • K. Bock
  • Medicine
  • Medizinische Klinik
  • 2001
Methods and importance of meta-analyses are critically discussed as well as the meaning of the term publication bias, which will improve some steps in the transfer process. Expand
Hunting Causes and Using Them: Is There No Bridge from Here to There?
Causation is in trouble—at least as it is pictured in current theories in philosophy and in economics as well, where causation is also once again in fashion. In both disciplines the accounts ofExpand
Randomization and Social Policy Evaluation
This paper considers the recent case for randomized social experimentation and contrasts it with older cases for social experimentation. The recent case eschews behavioral models, assumes thatExpand
Error in economics: the methodology of evidence-based economics
What is the correct concept behind measures of inflation? Does money cause business activity or is it the other way around? Shall we stimulate growth by raising aggregate demand or rather by loweringExpand
How the Laws of Physics Lie.
Nancy Cartwright argues for a novel conception of the role of fundamental scientific laws in modern natural science. If we attend closely to the manner in which theoretical laws figure in theExpand
Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance
The ontological difference between the hypothetical frequency interpretations advanced by Kyburg [1974], [1978] and by van Fraassen [1977], [1979] and the single-case dispositional analysis advancedExpand