What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior

@article{Wynne2006WhatAA,
  title={What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior},
  author={Clive D.L. Wynne},
  journal={Comparative Cognition \& Behavior Reviews},
  year={2006},
  volume={2},
  pages={125-135}
}
  • C. Wynne
  • Published 2006
  • Biology
  • Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews
Before Darwin, the relationship of humans to the rest of creation was straightforward. Animals had instincts and habits: humans were blessed with rationality and language. Darwin’s recognition of the interrelatedness of all living things made this position untenable. Around the time of the publication of Darwin’s theory of evolution by natural selection, people began to use the term “anthropomorphism” to describe the attribution of human qualities to nonhuman animals. The rise of Behaviorism (e… 

Figures from this paper

Anti-anthropomorphism and Its Limits
TLDR
An elucidation of “anthropomorphism” is provided in the field of common sense knowledge, the issue of animal rights, and about the use of humans as a model in the scientific explanation.
A Role for Folk Psychology in Animal Cognition Research
If we consider that the field of animal cognition research began with Darwin’s stories about clever animals, we can see that over the 150 years of work done in this field, there has been a slow swing
Anthropomorphism, anthropectomy, and the null hypothesis
We examine the claim that the methodology of psychology leads to a bias in animal cognition research against attributing “anthropomorphic” properties to animals (Sober in Thinking with animals: new
Philosophical Ethology: On the extents of what it is to be a pig
Answers to the question, “What is a farm animal?” often revolve around genetics, physical attributes, and the animals’ functions in agricultural production. The essential and defining characteristics
Philosophical Primatology: Reflections on Theses of Anthropological Difference, the Logic of Anthropomorphism and Anthropodenial, and the Self-other Category Mistake Within the Scope of Cognitive Primate Research
This article investigates the deep-rooted logical structures underlying our thinking about other animals with a particular focus on topics relevant for cognitive primate research. We begin with a
Darwin's mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds
TLDR
It is suggested that recent symbolic-connectionist models of cognition shed new light on the mechanisms that underlie the gap between human and nonhuman minds.
Stop avoiding the inevitable: The effects of anthropomorphism in science writing for non-experts
TLDR
There was no difference in understanding, enjoyment or frequency of anthropomorphic thinking between anthropomorphic and non-anthropomorphic texts, suggesting that anthropomorphism acts as an evocative, albeit potentially distracting, technique but does not cause significant misconceptions.
Language and radical anthropocentrism: the view from the Harrisian supercategory
Abstract The article critically engages with the posthumanist discourse on anthropocentrism and human exceptionalism. It adopts an “integrational” approach to signs, language, and communication, as
Why Brains Are Not Computers, Why Behaviorism Is Not Satanism, and Why Dolphins Are Not Aquatic Apes
TLDR
A more mutualistic, embodied, enactive view might allow us to ask more interesting questions about how animals of all kinds come to know their worlds, in ways that avoid the (inevitable) anthropocentric baggage of the cognitivist viewpoint.
The coelacanth still lives: Bringing selection back to the fore in a science of behavior.
TLDR
Light is shed on an underappreciated and critical insight, namely, that the consequences of behavior have a selective effect analogous to that observed in biological evolution.
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 48 REFERENCES
Anthropomorphism and Anthropomorphic Selection—Beyond the "Cute Response"
TLDR
The origin and evolutionary implications of anthropomorphic thinking enables animal companions' social behavior to be construed in human terms, thereby allowing these nonhuman animals to function for their human owners or guardians as providers of nonhuman social support.
10 – Biological Behaviorism
Animal mind and the argument from design.
TLDR
Darwin provided the natural evolutionary mechanisms that eliminated the need for positing a divine creator to explain the structure of animals; he was thus able to treat the historical problem of organic evolution by providing a historical solution.
On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection: Or, The Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life
Charles Darwin's seminal formulation of the theory of evolution, "On the Origin of Species" continues to be as controversial today as when it was first published. This "Penguin Classics" edition
Patterns of Behavior: Konrad Lorenz, Niko Tinbergen, and the Founding of Ethology
It is hard to imagine, by their very name, the life sciences not involving the study of living things, but until the twentieth century much of what was known in the field was based primarily on
Animal Intelligence; Experimental Studies
Animal Intelligence is a consolidated record of Edward L. Thorndike's theoretical and empirical contributions to the comparative psychology of learning. Thorndike's approach is systematic and
What is folk psychology?
Animal intelligence: An experimental study of the associative processes in animals.
II T his monograph is an attempt at an explanation of the nature of the process of association in the animal mind. Inasmuch as there have been no extended researches of a character similar to the
Introduction Comparative psychology
The term ‘comparative psychology’ does not reflect well present thought on animal behaviour, but yet it remains a frequently used title of this area of work. Accordingly, it is perhaps as well to set
...
...