What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition?

@inproceedings{Longa2008WhatAA,
  title={What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition?},
  author={Victor M. Longa and Guillermo Lorenzo},
  year={2008}
}
Abstract The Minimalist Program introduced a new concept of language and added new content to the innateness position concerning our linguistic capacity. It also redefined the metatheoretical role of the theory of acquisition within generative grammar. This article explores at length all these issues and offers a critical survey of the disconcerting situation dominating today's relationship between syntacticians and acquisitionists. 
Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax
TLDR
This chapter discusses grammatical structures and their role in the loss of syntactic variation, as well as some of the strategies used to deal with variation.
Minimalism in SLA
What Chomsky and his followers persist is that thought is not influenced by language and is only expressed by it. Zahedi (2008) claims Chomsky's determinist approach to language comprises three
What Can an Extended Synthesis do for Biolinguistics: On the Needs and Benefits of Eco-Evo-Devo Program
TLDR
This chapter focuses on a range of historical, conceptual, and empirical issues surrounding language and seeks to address what evo-devo could do for biolinguistics.
Which model of biological plausibility for language? The case of “What Darwin Got Wrong”
TLDR
It is argued that organism-internal properties, which can be captured via the formal notion of “conservativity”, must be found in language as well and only those lin-guistic theories that capture these properties can be considered as biolinguistically plausible.
Universal Grammar and Biological Variation: An EvoDevo Agenda for Comparative Biolinguistics
TLDR
This article discusses what this new source of diversity reveals about the biological reality underlying Universal Grammar, and sketches future directions for what it is called “comparative biolinguistics,” specifying which experimental directions may help us succeed in this new research avenue.
The evolution of the Faculty of Language from a Chomskyan perspective: bridging linguistics and biology.
  • V. M. Longa
  • Biology
    Journal of anthropological sciences = Rivista di antropologia : JASS
  • 2013
TLDR
It is argued that the biological machinery of language is neither specifically linguistic nor specifically human, although language itself can still be considered a species-specific innate trait, based on the high specificity of language.
Prolegomena to a Future Science of Biolinguistics
This essay reviews some of the problems that face biolinguistics if it is to someday succeed in understanding human language from a biological and evolutionary viewpoint. Although numerous
The Development of Morpho-Syntactic Competence in Italian-Speaking Children: a Usage-Based Approach
Usage-Based scholars (e.g. Lieven et al., 2009) have shown that children’s early grammar is characterisable as knowledge of lexically-specific patterns (kick KICKEE) learnt from previously
...
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 103 REFERENCES
Language acquisition in the absence of experience
  • S. Crain
  • Linguistics
    Behavioral and Brain Sciences
  • 1991
Abstract A fundamental goal of linguistic theory is to explain how natural languages are acquired. This paper describes some recent findings on how learners acquire syntactic knowledge for which
Language acquisition : the growth of grammar
TLDR
This text provides a comprehensive introduction to current thinking on language acquisition and adopts the perspective of Chomskyan Universal Generative Grammar throughout, assuming a familiarity with basic concepts of linguistic theory.
Bare Phrase Structure
This paper is an extension of earlier ones (Chomsky 1991, 1993) that were concerned with two related questions: (1) What conditions on the human language faculty are imposed by considerations of
The Minimalist Program
In his foundational book, The Minimalist Program, published in 1995, Noam Chomsky offered a significant contribution to the generative tradition in linguistics. This twentieth-anniversary edition
Three Factors in Language Design
The biolinguistic perspective regards the language faculty as an organ of the body, along with other cognitive systems. Adopting it, we expect to find three factors that interact to determine (I-)
Nature, Nurture And Universal Grammar
In just a few years, children achieve a stable state of linguistic competence, making them effectively adults with respect to: understanding novel sentences, discerning relations of paraphrase and
Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments
Abstract This article examines a type of argument for linguistic nativism that takes the following form: (i) a fact about some natural language is exhibited that allegedly could not be learned from
Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use
Why do we know so much more than we have evidence for in certain areas, and so much less in others? In tackling these questions--Plato's and Orwell's problem--Chomsky again demonstrates his
वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax
TLDR
Methodological preliminaries of generative grammars as theories of linguistic competence; theory of performance; organization of a generative grammar; justification of grammar; descriptive and explanatory theories; evaluation procedures; linguistic theory and language learning.
Why language acquisition is a snap
Abstract Nativists inspired by Chomsky are apt to provide arguments with the following general form: languages exhibit interesting generalizations that are not suggested by casual (or even intensive)
...
...