What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition?

@inproceedings{Longa2008WhatAA,
  title={What about a (really) minimalist theory of language acquisition?},
  author={Victor M. Longa and Guillermo Lorenzo},
  year={2008}
}
Abstract The Minimalist Program introduced a new concept of language and added new content to the innateness position concerning our linguistic capacity. It also redefined the metatheoretical role of the theory of acquisition within generative grammar. This article explores at length all these issues and offers a critical survey of the disconcerting situation dominating today's relationship between syntacticians and acquisitionists. 

Three factors in the design and acquisition of language.

  • W. O'grady
  • Linguistics
    Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science
  • 2012
TLDR
Of particular interest is the third of these factors, whose importance is now widely recognized, raising questions about its character, its role in shaping the language faculty, and its impact on the future of linguistic research.

Elementary Syntactic Structures: Prospects of a Feature-Free Syntax

TLDR
This chapter discusses grammatical structures and their role in the loss of syntactic variation, as well as some of the strategies used to deal with variation.

Beyond developmental compatibility: A note on generative linguistics and the developmentalist challenge

The study of language acquisition within the Chomskyan tradition has moved from a stage in which the developmental path of languages in the mind of children was ignored to a stage in which

Minimalism in SLA

What Chomsky and his followers persist is that thought is not influenced by language and is only expressed by it. Zahedi (2008) claims Chomsky's determinist approach to language comprises three

A Multidimensional Interdisciplinary Framework for Linguistics: The Lexicon as a Case Study*

This paper contrasts the standard modular, uni-dimensional approach of linguistic studies with a more interdisciplinary, multi-dimensional approach, and claims that the latter has a better chance of

What Can an Extended Synthesis do for Biolinguistics: On the Needs and Benefits of Eco-Evo-Devo Program

TLDR
This chapter focuses on a range of historical, conceptual, and empirical issues surrounding language and seeks to address what evo-devo could do for biolinguistics.

Which model of biological plausibility for language? The case of “What Darwin Got Wrong”

TLDR
It is argued that organism-internal properties, which can be captured via the formal notion of “conservativity”, must be found in language as well and only those lin-guistic theories that capture these properties can be considered as biolinguistically plausible.

Universal Grammar and Biological Variation: An EvoDevo Agenda for Comparative Biolinguistics

TLDR
This article discusses what this new source of diversity reveals about the biological reality underlying Universal Grammar, and sketches future directions for what it is called “comparative biolinguistics,” specifying which experimental directions may help us succeed in this new research avenue.

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 102 REFERENCES

Language acquisition : the growth of grammar

TLDR
This text provides a comprehensive introduction to current thinking on language acquisition and adopts the perspective of Chomskyan Universal Generative Grammar throughout, assuming a familiarity with basic concepts of linguistic theory.

Bare Phrase Structure

This paper is an extension of earlier ones (Chomsky 1991, 1993) that were concerned with two related questions: (1) What conditions on the human language faculty are imposed by considerations of

The Minimalist Program

In his foundational book, The Minimalist Program, published in 1995, Noam Chomsky offered a significant contribution to the generative tradition in linguistics. This twentieth-anniversary edition

Three Factors in Language Design

The biolinguistic perspective regards the language faculty as an organ of the body, along with other cognitive systems. Adopting it, we expect to find three factors that interact to determine (I-)

Nature, Nurture And Universal Grammar

In just a few years, children achieve a stable state of linguistic competence, making them effectively adults with respect to: understanding novel sentences, discerning relations of paraphrase and

Empirical assessment of stimulus poverty arguments

Abstract This article examines a type of argument for linguistic nativism that takes the following form: (i) a fact about some natural language is exhibited that allegedly could not be learned from

Knowledge of language: its nature, origin, and use

Why do we know so much more than we have evidence for in certain areas, and so much less in others? In tackling these questions--Plato's and Orwell's problem--Chomsky again demonstrates his

Why language acquisition is a snap

Abstract Nativists inspired by Chomsky are apt to provide arguments with the following general form: languages exhibit interesting generalizations that are not suggested by casual (or even intensive)

Development of the concept of “the poverty of the stimulus”

Abstract ‘The poverty of the stimulus’ is a key concept within generative linguistics. This article attempts in three ways to better understand the nature of that concept and the context of its use:

Empirical re-assessment of stimulus poverty arguments

Abstract It is a fact that the child learner does not entertain logically possible but empirically impossible linguistic hypotheses, despite the absence of sufficient disconfirming evidence. While
...