What We Know and What We Don’t Know About Variation in Social Organization: Melvin Ember’s Approach to the Study of Kinship

@article{Ember2011WhatWK,
  title={What We Know and What We Don’t Know About Variation in Social Organization: Melvin Ember’s Approach to the Study of Kinship},
  author={C. R. Ember},
  journal={Cross-Cultural Research},
  year={2011},
  volume={45},
  pages={16 - 36}
}
  • C. R. Ember
  • Published 2011
  • Sociology
  • Cross-Cultural Research
  • Focusing on Melvin Ember’s kinship interests, this article tries to summarize what we know and don’t know about the conditions favoring different aspects of cultural variation in kinship and social organization. What explains the incest taboo and its variable extensions to cousin marriage? What explains marriage? What explains variation in marital residence patterns? Why polygyny versus monogamy? Why are family households extended or independent? Why do unilineal descent groups form? 

    Tables from this paper.

    Post-marital residence patterns show lineage-specific evolution
    • 9
    • Open Access

    References

    Publications referenced by this paper.
    SHOWING 1-10 OF 49 REFERENCES
    Division of Labor by Gender and Postmarital Residence in Cross-Cultural Perspective: A Reconsideration
    • 25
    • Open Access
    An Evaluation of Alternative Theories of Matrilocal Versus Patrilocal Residence
    • 48
    On the Conditions Favoring Extended Family Households
    • 39
    Incest and exogamy: A sociobiological reconsideration
    • 93
    Societal Complexity and Familial Complexity: Evidence for the Curvilinear Hypothesis
    • 97
    On the Origin and Extension of the Incest Taboo
    • 63
    • Highly Influential
    Alternative Predictors of Polygyny
    • 32