What Sorts of Machines Can Understand the Symbols They Use ?

  title={What Sorts of Machines Can Understand the Symbols They Use ?},
  author={Aaron Sloman},
My topic is a specialised v ariant of the old philosophical question ‘could a machine think?’. Some say it is only a matter of time before computer-based artefacts will beha ve as if they had thoughts and perhaps e ven feelings, pains or an y other occupants of the human mind, conscious or unconscious. I shall not pre-judge this issue. The space of possible computing systems is so vast, and we ha ve explored such a tin y corner, that it would be as rash to pronounce on what we may or may not… CONTINUE READING


Publications citing this paper.


Publications referenced by this paper.
Showing 1-10 of 12 references

Procedural semantics as a theory of meaning’, in Elements of discourse understanding

W. A. Woods
View 10 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Revolution in Philosophy: Philosophy Science and Models of Mind, Harvester

View 3 Excerpts
Highly Influenced

Strong strong and weak strong AI

A. Sloman
SB Quarterly, • 1985
View 1 Excerpt

Panel Discussion: Under What conditions can a machine attrib ute meaning to symbols

A. Sloman, D. McDermott, W. A. Woods
Proc 8th International Joint Conference on AI, Karlsruhe, • 1983
View 2 Excerpts

The Varieties of Reference

Evans, Gareth

Minds , Brains , and Programs ’ , with commentaries by other authors and Searle ’ s reply

J. R. Searle
The Behavioural and Brain Sciences • 1980

The primacy of non-communicati ve language’, inThe analysis of Meaning: Informatics 5, Proceedings ASLIB/BCS conference Oxford, March 1979, Eds: M.MacCafferty and K.Gray

A. Sloman
View 1 Excerpt

The Language of Thought Harvester

J. A. Fodor
View 1 Excerpt

Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics, Methuen

Strawson, F P.

Similar Papers

Loading similar papers…