What Scientific Theories Could Not Be*

@article{Halvorson2012WhatST,
  title={What Scientific Theories Could Not Be*},
  author={Hans Halvorson},
  journal={Philosophy of Science},
  year={2012},
  volume={79},
  pages={183 - 206}
}
According to the semantic view of scientific theories, theories are classes of models. I show that this view—if taken literally—leads to absurdities. In particular, this view equates theories that are distinct, and it distinguishes theories that are equivalent. Furthermore, the semantic view lacks the resources to explicate interesting theoretical relations, such as embeddability of one theory into another. The untenability of the semantic view—as currently formulated—threatens to undermine… Expand
The Semantic View, If Plausible, Is Syntactic
Halvorson argues that the semantic view of theories leads to absurdities. Glymour shows how to inoculate the semantic view against Halvorson’s criticisms, namely, by making it into a syntactic viewExpand
Theoretical Equivalence and the Semantic View of Theories
Halvorson argues through a series of examples and a general result due to Myers that the “semantic view” of theories has no available account of formal theoretical equivalence. De Bouvere providesExpand
Semantic realism in the semantic conception of theories
TLDR
Making sense of semantic realism requires specifying the conditions of application of theoretical models, even for models that are not actually used, which leads to several difficulties. Expand
The Representational Semantic Conception
This article argues for a representational semantic conception (RSC) of scientific theories, which respects the bare claim of any semantic view, namely, that theories can be characterized as sets ofExpand
One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View
In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely,Expand
One or Two Gentle Remarks about Hans Halvorson’s Critique of the Semantic View
In recent papers Hans Halvorson has offered a critique of the semantic view of theories, showing that theories may be the same although the corresponding sets of models are different and, conversely,Expand
What Was the Syntax‐Semantics Debate in the Philosophy of Science About?
The debate between critics of syntactic and semantic approaches to the formalization of scientific theories has been going on for over 50 years. I structure the debate in light of a recent exchangeExpand
Psychological Explanation, Ontological Commitment and the Semantic View of Theories
Naturalistic philosophers of mind must assume some philosophy of science. For naturalism demands that we look to psychology — but to be guided by psychological theories, one must have some storyExpand
Scientific Representation and Theoretical Equivalence
TLDR
It is argued that by paying attention to how a model is used to draw inferences about its target system, the authors can define a notion of theoretical equivalence that turns on whether models license the same claims about the same target systems. Expand
Scientific Realism, the Semantic View and Evolutionary Biology
TLDR
This work will analyse some of the difficulties which arise when trying to use Ontic Structural Realism to account for evolutionary biology. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 47 REFERENCES
Scientific Representation and the Semantic View of Theories
  • R. Frigg
  • Philosophy, Computer Science
  • 2006
TLDR
The conundrums that a theory of scientific representation has to come to terms with are introduced and the question of whether the semantic view of theories provides adequate answers to these questions is addressed. Expand
Science and Partial Truth: A Unitary Approach to Models and Scientific Reasoning
Da Costa and French explore the consequences of adopting a "pragmatic" notion of truth in the philosophy of science-in other words, accepting a theory as valid when it may only be partially trueExpand
Multiple realizability and the semantic view of theories
TLDR
It is argued that the idea that multiple realizability is an interesting scientific notion, or else admit that multiply realizable properties do not automatically block scientific reductions, is a holdover from the late positivist axiomatic view of theories. Expand
Philosophy of Psychology Meets the Semantic View
  • V. Hardcastle
  • Psychology
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1994
Many philosophers of psychology fail to appreciate the constructivist process of science as well as its pragmatic aspects. A well-developed philosophy of science helps to clear many conceptualExpand
Connectionism, eliminativism, and the semantic view of theories
Recently some philosophers have urged that connectionist artificial intelligence is (potentially) eliminative for the propositional attitudes of folk psychology. At the same time, however, theseExpand
What's Wrong with the Received View of Evolutionary Theory?
  • J. Beatty
  • Mathematics
  • PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association
  • 1980
Much if not most recent literature in philosophy of biology concerns the extent to which biological theories conform to what is known as the "received" philosophical view of scientific theories, aExpand
The Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory.
TLDR
In analyzing the logical structure of evolutionary biology, Elisabeth Lloyd argues that the semantic account is more appropriate and powerful. Expand
Interpretability of Elementary Theories
The word ‘theory’ is often understood as dependent on the language used to formalise it (cf. e.g. Henkin et al, 1971, p. 44). As a consequence, the theory of groups formalised without a neutralExpand
The "Structure" of Physics: A Case Study
We are used to talking about the “structure” posited by a given theory of physics, such as the spacetime structure of relativity. What is “structure”? What does the mathematical structure used toExpand
An Interpretive Isomorphism Between Binary and Ternary Relations
  • D. Myers
  • Mathematics, Computer Science
  • Structures in Logic and Computer Science
  • 1997
TLDR
The result that the theory of a binary relation and a ternary relation are interpretively isomorphic is established, i.e., they are mutually interpretable by a pair of interpretations each of which is the inverse of the other. Expand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...