What Practices Constitute Torture? US and UN Standards

@article{Nowak2006WhatPC,
  title={What Practices Constitute Torture? US and UN Standards},
  author={Manfred Nowak},
  journal={Human Rights Quarterly},
  year={2006},
  volume={28},
  pages={809 - 841}
}
  • M. Nowak
  • Published 2006
  • Sociology
  • Human Rights Quarterly
This article is a response to the attempts of the US government to redefine torture in a highly restrictive sense and at the same time distinguishing it from other forms of cruel inhuman or degrading treatment (CIDT). To this end, the author undertakes a short analysis of the understanding of the concept of torture and CIDT by the present US Government and asks whether this interpretation corresponds to the definition of torture in Article 1, Convention against Torture (CAT). An analysis of the… Expand
The United Nations Convention Against Torture: A Commentary (review)
In 1984, after a relatively brief seven years of negotiation, the UN General Assembly adopted the Convention Against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (CAT). TheExpand
Torture laid bare
Torture, while internationally sanctioned, is not well-defined. This paper sets out a Minimal English definition of the crime of ‘torture’ in international law. The four elements of torture are: (1)Expand
Torture Laid Bare: Global English and Human Rights
The prohibition against torture is a well settled, absolute right in international law and human rights. As such, it presents an ideal case to understand what is at stake in human rights generally.Expand
The Criminalization of Torture in South Africa
Abstract This article describes the politics related to the criminalization of torture in South Africa. It studies the differences between torture as an international crime and as a crime underExpand
The prohibition of torture in international law in times of "war on terror"
The prohibition of torture in international law is dangerously threatened by the need for national security in times of the "war on terror". The US government attempted to circumvent the prohibitionExpand
The Tortured Patient
  • 2012
May-June 2011 Torture is unethical and usually counterproductive. It is prohibited by international and national laws. Yet it persists: according to Amnesty International, torture is widespread inExpand
Torture-free cyberspace – a human right
Definitions of torture range from the emotive to the legal. The media sometimes uses the term in a loose or informal sense – for example, to refer to the pain felt when one's sports team loses aExpand
Australia, US torture and the power of international law
  • J. Barnes
  • Political Science
  • Australian Journal of Political Science
  • 2019
ABSTRACT Australia cooperated extensively with the George W. Bush administration during the ‘war on terror.’ However, in doing so, Australia failed to condemn, and in some instances, condoned USExpand
Why the torture taboo matters
Torture is one of the most prohibited practices in international society and has become a symbol of cruel and unnecessary suffering. Despite this absolute prohibition, torture is widely practiced byExpand
No Relief in Sight: Barring Bivens Claims in Torture Cases
Generally, the appropriate private cause of action against officials who, under color of federal law, violate someone’s Constitutional rights is to seek damages in a Bivens law suit. When nationalExpand
...
1
2
3
4
5
...

References

SHOWING 1-8 OF 8 REFERENCES
Challenges to the Absolute Nature of the Prohibition of Torture and Ill-Treatment
The right to personal integrity and dignity or, as it has been phrased in international human rights documents, the prohibition of torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, hasExpand
Getting to Grips with Torture
  • M. Evans
  • Sociology
  • International and Comparative Law Quarterly
  • 2002
In October 2000 an informal working group of the United Nations Commission on Human Rights met to discuss the latest drafts of an Optional Protocol to the 1984 United Nations Convention againstExpand
Israel's Supreme Court and International Human Rights Law: The Judgement on ‘Moderate Physical Pressure’
On September 6, 1999, the Israeli Supreme Court, sitting as the High Court of Justice, handed down its latest judgement on the question of the use of ‘moderate physical pressure’. The lack ofExpand