What Not to Multiply Without Necessity

@article{Schaffer2015WhatNT,
  title={What Not to Multiply Without Necessity},
  author={Jonathan Schaffer},
  journal={Australasian Journal of Philosophy},
  year={2015},
  volume={93},
  pages={644 - 664}
}
  • J. Schaffer
  • Published 2 October 2015
  • Philosophy
  • Australasian Journal of Philosophy
The Razor commands us not to multiply entities without necessity. I argue for an alternative principle—The Laser—which commands us not to multiply fundamental entities without necessity. 

There is no reason to replace the Razor with the Laser

In recent times it has become common to encounter philosophers who recommend the replacement of one principle concerning theory choice, Ockham’s Razor, with another: the Laser. Whilst the Razor tells

Reply to Audi, Bliss, Rosen, Schaffer, and Wang

ABSTRACT I reply to five critics of my book. In particular, I tackle criticisms of my treatment of causation, relative fundamentality, and generativity. I also take on the question of my reliance on

Why Ockham’s Razor should be preferred to the Laser

Ockham’s Razor advises us to not multiply entities (or kinds of entities) without necessity. Recently, Jonathan Schaffer and Karen Bennett have argued that we ought to replace Ockham’s Razor with the

About Presumptions of Physics

There are many essential presumptions in modern physics without sufficient reasoning untested by scientific processes. Some of them are presupposed for consistency of a particular theory. Some

We Need Non-factive Metaphysical Explanation

Suppose that A explains B. Do A and B need to be true? Provided that we have metaphysical explanation in mind, orthodoxy answers “yes:” metaphysical explanation is factive. This article introduces

The Simplicity of Metaphysical Structures

Discussions about metaphysical simplicity typically address ontological parsimony—the number of entities (or kinds of entities) that theories posit. This emphasis, while understandable for

Do Not Revise Ockham's Razor Without Necessity

Ockham’s razor asks that we not multiply entities beyond necessity. The razor is a powerful methodological tool, enabling us to articulate reasons for preferring one theory to another. There are

A new cosmological argument from grounding

This paper presents a new cosmological argument based on considerations about grounding. I argue that, by assuming three plausible principles about grounding, we can construct a cosmological argument

Sums and Grounding

ABSTRACT As I will use the term, an object is a mereological sum of some things just in case those things compose it simply in virtue of existing. In the first half of this paper, I argue that there

Metaphysical Constraints, Primitivism, and Reduction

  • Michael Bertrand
  • Philosophy, Biology
    Journal of the American Philosophical Association
  • 2019
It is argued that there is a robust sense of ‘primitive’ present in the metaphysics literature that cannot be inferred via the argument from absence of analysis, and that this sense is exhausted by the denial of reduction.
...

References

SHOWING 1-10 OF 42 REFERENCES

Against simplicity

Sometimes metaphysicians appeal to simplicity as a reason to prefer one metaphysical theory to another, especially when a philosophical dispute has otherwise reached a state of equilibrium. In this

Grounding in the image of causation

Grounding is often glossed as metaphysical causation, yet no current theory of grounding looks remotely like a plausible treatment of causation. I propose to take the analogy between grounding and

From nihilism to monism

Mereological nihilism is the view that all concrete objects are simple. Existence monism is the view that the only concrete object is one big simple: the world. I will argue that nihilism culminates

How to have a radically minimal ontology

In this paper I further elucidate and defend a metaontological position that allows you to have a minimal ontology without embracing an error-theory of ordinary talk. On this view ‘there are Fs’ can

Parts Of Classes

Taking classes apart the trouble with classes a framework for set theory set theory for mereologists.

Quantitative Parsimony

  • Daniel Nolan
  • Philosophy
    The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science
  • 1997
In this paper, I motivate the view that quantitative parsimony is a theoretical virtue: that is, we should be concerned not only to minimize the number of kinds of entities postulated by our theories

The Identity of Indiscernibles

The principle of the identity of indiscernibles would seem, in the forms in which it is usually stated, to be at best contingently true. It does not appear that even Leibniz held it to be logically

When is parsimony a virtue

Parsimony is a virtue of empirical theories. Is it also a virtue of philosophical theories? I review four contemporary accounts of the virtue of parsimony in empirical theorizing, and consider how

Monism: The Priority of the Whole

Consider a circle and a pair of its semicircles. Which is prior, the whole or its parts? Are the semicircles dependent abstractions from their whole, or is the circle a derivative construction from

A World of States of Affairs

This is a position paper or trailer for a larger work in progress and having the same title. My hypothesis is that the world is a world of states of affairs. I think that I am saying the same thing